The Origins of the Non-Adamic Races

Featured
‘The Creation of Adam’ -Michelangelo

As many of you know and as I have endeavoured to establish throughout my writings the descendants of the biblical patriarch Adam are found only among the Caucasoid race. This is proven by the identification of the biblical nations and the chronology of Scripture in relation to biological anthropology, physical descriptions of the Adamites in Scripture and key identifying evidences found in within the European genome. That however is beyond the scope of this presentation.

‘Adam: The Patriarch of One Race’

https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/adam-the-patriarch-of-one-race/

It is clear in many places in Scripture that there were hominids inhabiting the planet before Adam. Cain took wives and established a city in the land of Nod. There are several tribes in the Scriptures with no Adamic lineage including Zuzim, Emim, Kennizites, Perizzites, Kadmonites and Rephaim et al. The latter two descended from the Nephilim (the Rephaim) and Cain with his non-Adamic wives (the Kenites). 

A thorough understanding of the events in Genesis 3 reveals that the serpent who came to Eve in the garden was himself a pre-Adamite and no literal serpent. There existed an entire genealogical tree of races in Eden when Adam was placed in the garden.

https://christogenea.org/podcasts/identifying-tree-knowledge-good-and-evil

‘The Origins of the Serpent Seed’

https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-origins-of-the-serpent-seed/

‘The Temptation of Eve’ 
-Pierre Jan van der Ouderaa

While it is largely beyond the scope of this discussion, and has been covered extensively by better scholars it can be established that the flood of Noah did not cover the entire globe. Suffice it to say here that the “earth” or “land” (erets in Hebrew, ge in Greek. Strong’s H776 and G1093) was only that land known to antedeluvian Adamic man; the Fertile Crescent and Mediterranean Basin.

Other races which existed throughout the planet would have been largely unaffected. Thus we see both the Kenites and Rephaim survived after the flood (Genesis 15.19) despite their absence on the ark (Genesis 7.13, 1 Peter 3.20). Some claim that the Kenites descended from Kenite wives allegedly taken aboard the ark by the sons of Noah, but there is not a single instance in Scripture of women passing on patronyms. All Biblical genealogies are reckoned strictly by paternal lineage and Kenite (H7017) is a patronym derived from Cain (H7014). There was no Kenite man onboard the ark to pass on this patronym and all life in the outside the ark in the affected land perished in the flood (Genesis 7.21-23). Therefore the Kenites along with the Rephaim must have been absent from the land affected by the flood.

The belief that the flood of Noah was not a global event was also known to early Christians such as St. Theophilus of Antioch (Theophilus to Autolycus, book 3, chapter 18) and ancient Judaeans such as Flavius Josephus and Nicolaus of Damascus (Josephus’ Antiquities of the Judaeans 1.3.6). It is also evident that the early Christian writer Justin Martyr realized that the fallen Angels had survived the flood (Second Apology, chapter 5).

http://comparet.christogenea.org/content/noahs-flood-was-not-world-wide

https://christogenea.org/system/files/resources/Noahs%2520Flood.pdf

Christ himself references non-Adamites on several occasions in Scripture. In his parable of the wheat and the tares these non-Adamites are the tares planted by the adversary (Matthew 13.28). Christ once told certain Judeans that they descended from the Devil (John 8.44). Both Christ and John the Baptist refered to certain Judeans as a “race of vipers” or “brood of vipers” in reference to their partial descent from the serpent (Matthew 3.7, 23.33 et al.). Christ also told certain Judeans their race was guilty of the blood of Abel spilled by their forebear Cain (Matthew 23.35-36).

‘The Satanic Origins of the Kenite, Canaanite and Edomite Jews’

https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-satanic-origins-of-the-edomite-jews/

‘The Serpent Race in the Gospel of Matthew’

https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/02/02/the-serpent-race-in-the-gospel-of-matthew/

‘The Fall of the Rebel Angels’ 
-Peter Paul Rubens

There are a few very explicit references to non-Adamic terrestrial hominid beings in Scripture. In Isaiah 13.21-22 we find satyrs (sa’iyr, Strong’s H8163, probably the origin of Latin satyrus) or onokentauros (“donkey centaur”) following the LXX. These are mentioned alongside dragons, beasts, and monsters depending on the manuscript and the Vulgate has sirens in verse 22. In Isaiah 34.14 satyrs are mentioned again and appear alongside lilith (liyliyth, H3917) or lamia following the Vulgate.

These creatures are not mere fancy as the Scriptures are absolutely truthful. Rather these represent Adamic man’s characterization of creatures which are neither fully man or Angel nor fully beast. There are a few references in Scripture to beasts (a pejorative use of the term) with obvious hominid qualities. We also find pejorative references to people as animals accompanying these references to satyrs and lilith.

https://christogenea.org/podcasts/identifying-beast-field-index

Not only do we find non-Adamic hominids in Scripture but we also find references to non-Adamic races in much extra-biblical literature of the ancient Judean and Christian world.

In the Song of the Sage (4Q510-511 in the Dead Sea Scrolls) we find mention of various monstrous non-Adamic entities including lilith (plural).

“And I, the Instructor, proclaim His glorious splendour so as to frighten and to te[rrify] all the spirits of the destroying angels, spirits of the bastards, demons, lilith, howlers, and [desert dwellers…] and those which fall upon men without warning to lead them astray from a spirit of understanding and to make their heart and their […] desolate during the present dominion of wickedness and predetermined time of humiliations for the sons of lig[ht], by the guilt of the ages of [those] smitten by iniquity – not for eternal destruction, [bu]t for an era of humiliation for transgression.”

‘Mankind’s Eternal Dilemma, the Choice Between Virtue and Vice’ -Frans Francken the Younger

4 Maccabees 18.7-8 portrays “the serpent” (consider Genesis 3) as a fleshly being which may threaten the female speaker’s virginity and posterity (“the built up rib” of Adam) along with a “destroyer of the desert” or “ravager of the plain”.

“7 And the righteous mother of the seven children spake also as follows to her offspring: I was a pure virgin, and went not beyond my father’s house; but I took care of the built-up rib. 8 No destroyer of the desert, or ravisher of the plain, injured me; nor did the destructive, deceitful snake, make spoil of my chaste virginity; and I remained with my husband during the period of my prime.”
-4 Maccabees 18

The notion that Eve was seduced by the serpent was certainly known to Christians in the past and of course the serpent had to have been some type of hominid to have spoken and lain with Eve. The Protovengelion is an an apocryphal Christian text of the 2nd century AD and in it we see that the author clearly understood the sexual nature of Eve’s transgression.

“1 And when her sixth month was come, Joseph returned from his building houses abroad, which was his trade, and entering into the house, found the Virgin grown big: 2 Then smiting upon his face, he said, With what face can I look up to the Lord my God? or, what shall I say concerning this young woman? 3 For I received her a Virgin out of the temple of the Lord my God! and have not preserved her such! 4 Who has thus deceived me? Who has committed this evil in my house, and seducing the Virgin from me, hath defiled her? 5Is not the history of Adam exactly accomplished in me? 6For in the very instant of his glory, the serpent came and found Eve alone, and seduced her. 7Just after the same manner it has happened to me. 8 Then Joseph arising from the ground, called her, and said, O thou who hast been so much favoured by God, why hast thou done this? 9 Why hast thou thus debased thy soul, who wast educated in the Holy of Holies, and received thy food from the hand of angels? 10 But she, with a flood of tears, replied, I am innocent, and have known no man.”
-Protevangelion 10:1-10

‘The Temptation of Eve’ -John Roddam Spencer Stanhope

Another Christian text of the Celtic Church also testifies to the sexual nature of Eve’s seduction by the serpent. This testimony comes from an 8th century text known as the Loca Monachorum which contains a question and answer liturgy.

“Who died but was never born? (Adam).

Who gave but did not receive? (Eve, milk).

Who was born but did not die? (Elias and Enoch)

Who was born twice and died once? (Jonas the prophet, who for three days and three nights prayed in the belly of the whale. He neither saw the heavens nor touched the earth).

How many languages are there? (Seventy-two).

Who spoke with a dog? (St. Peter).

Who spoke with an ass? (Balaam the prophet).

Who was the first woman to commit adultery? (Eve with the serpent).

How were the Apostles baptized? (The Saviour washed their feet).”
-Ms. 908, The Loca Monachorum

One may reasonably dispute the authenticity of the Protevangelion and even perhaps the validity of the contents of the Loca Monachorum, but one may not reasonably dispute the fact that two geographically unconnected Christian assemblies centuries apart both understood that Eve committed adultery with the serpent.

There a number of references to non-Adamic races in certain writings of widely respected Ante-Nicaean Christian writers. Here Justin Martyr describes the transgression of the Angels and the begetting of their brood on earth.

“God, when He had made the whole world, and subjected things earthly to man, and arranged the heavenly elements for the increase of fruits and rotation of the seasons, and appointed this divine law – for these things also He evidently made for man – committed the care of men and of all things under heaven to angels whom He appointed over them. But the angels transgressed this appointment, and were captivated by love of women, and begat children who are those that are called demons; and besides, they afterwards subdued the human race to themselves, partly by magical writings, and partly by fears and the punishments they occasioned, and partly by teaching them to offer sacrifices, and incense, and libations, of which things they stood in need after they were enslaved by lustful passions; and among men they sowed murders, wars, adulteries, intemperate deeds, and all wickedness. Whence also the poets and mythologists, not knowing that it was the angels and those demons who had been begotten by them that did these things to men, and women, and cities, and nations, which they related, ascribed them to god himself, and to those who were accounted to be his very offspring, and to the offspring of those who were called his brother, Neptune and Pluto, and to the children again of these their offspring. For whatever name each of the angels had given to himself and his children, by that name they called them.”
-Justin Martyr, Second Apology, chapter 5, How the Angels Transgressed

‘The Fall of the Rebellious Angels’ 
-Frans Floris

Here Justin Martyr discusses these same events with the Judaean philosopher Trypho. Justin Martyr explains that the offspring of fallen Angels dwelt in Tanis in Egypt quoting the prophet Isaiah. It is apparent here that Justin Martyr not only knew of the races spawned by the fallen Angels, but that he also realized that they persisted in the world even until his own time. He also rightly associates this brood with the serpent who beguiled Eve.

“On this, Trypho, who was somewhat angry, but respected the Scriptures, as was manifest from his countenance, said to me, “The utterances of God are holy, but your expositions are mere contrivances, as is plain from what has been explained by you; nay, even blasphemies, for you assert that angels sinned and revolted from God.” And I, wishing to get him to listen to me, answered in milder tones, thus: “I admire, sir, this piety of yours; and I pray that you may entertain the same disposition towards Him to whom angels are recorded to minister, as Daniel says; for [one] like the Son of man is led to the Ancient of days, and every kingdom is given to Him for ever and ever. But that you may know, sir,” continued I, “that it is not our audacity which has induced us to adopt this exposition, which you reprehend, I shall give you evidence from Isaiah himself; for he affirms that evil angels have dwelt and do dwell in Tanis, in Egypt. These are [his] words: ‘Woe to the rebellious children! Thus saith the Lord, You have taken counsel, but not through Me; and [made] agreements, but not through My Spirit, to add sins to sins; who have sinned in going down to Egypt (but they have not inquired at Me), that they may be assisted by Pharaoh, and be covered with the shadow of the Egyptians. For the shadow of Pharaoh shall be a disgrace to you, and a reproach to those who trust in the Egyptians; for the princes in Tanis are evil angels. In vain will they labour for a people which will not profit them by assistance, but [will be] for a disgrace and a reproach [to them].’ And, further, Zechariah tells, as you yourself have related, that the devil stood on the right hand of Joshua the priest, to resist him; and [the Lord] said, ‘The Lord, who has taken Jerusalem, rebuke thee.’ And again, it is written in Job, as you said yourself, how that the angels came to stand before the Lord, and the devil came with them. And we have it recorded by Moses in the beginning of Genesis, that the serpent beguiled Eve, and was cursed. And we know that in Egypt there were magicians who emulated the mighty power displayed by God through the faithful servant Moses. And you are aware that David said, ‘The gods of the nations are demons.’”
-The Dialogue with Trypho, chapter 79, He Proves against Trypho that the Wicked Angels have Revolted from God

‘Saint Michael’ -Gerard David

Here Tertullian, while discussing demons, mentions that the fallen Angels begot a damned brood who endeavour to destroy the children of Adam.

“We are instructed, moreover, by our sacred books how from certain angels, who fell of their own free-will, there sprang a more wicked demon-brood, condemned of God along with the authors of their race, and that chief we have referred to. It will for the present be enough, however, that some account is given of their work. Their great business is the ruin of mankind. So, from the very first, spiritual wickedness sought our destruction.”
-Tertullian, Apology, chapter 22

In light of this information we are left with the question; where did the other races come from?

We find in Scripture that Christ uttered “things which have been kept secret from the foundation of the world” (Matthew 13.35) and among these revelations we find that Satan and his fallen Angels were cast down to earth. This is seen in Luke 18.18 where Christ speaks: “I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven.” It is also described in the Revelation:

“7 And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,

8 And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.

9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.”
-Revelation 12

Of course it is somewhat common knowledge that the fallen Angels begat the Nephilim after the creation of Adam giving us half Adamic and half Angelic offspring. 

https://christogenea.org/essays/problem-genesis-61-4

Lesser known is that Cain was also of non-Adamic lineage but I hope to have clarified this in other writings. We also know that non-Adamic races preceeded these unions and the creation of the Adamic race, thus we have the tree of the knowledge of good and evil (a genetic tree) and the people with whom Cain founded a city and spawned the Kenites.

‘The Origins of the Serpent Seed’

https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-origins-of-the-serpent-seed/

‘Archangel Michael Fights the Devil and the Virgin of the Assumption of the Angels’
-Dosso Dossi and Battista Dossi

I view the extant Enoch literature with great skepticism as it has been preserved outside of Western literary tradition but while it is certainly not Scripture it does help to shed light here. In chapter 85 of 1 Enoch we see the fallen Angels perpetrating the hybridization of species. This of course contradicts the natural law of kind after kind established by God in the very first chapter of Scripture:

“1. And again I saw with mine eyes as I slept, and I saw the heaven above, and behold a star fell from heaven, and it arose and ate and pastured amongst those oxen. 2. And after that I saw the large and the black oxen, and behold they all changed their stalls and pastures and their cattle, and began to live with each other. 3. And again I saw in the vision, and looked towards the heaven, and behold I saw many stars descend and cast themselves down from heaven to that first star, and they became bulls amongst those cattle and pastured with them [amongst them]. 4. And I looked at them and saw, and behold they all let out their privy members, like horses, and began to cover the cows of the oxen, and they all became pregnant and bare elephants, camels, and asses. 5. And all the oxen feared them and were affrighted at them, and began to bite with their teeth and to devour, and to gore with their horns. 6. And they began, moreover, to devour those oxen; and behold all the children of the earth began to tremble and quake before them and to flee from them.”

It is evident from the preceding chapter that the oxen who commingled in verse 2 are the Kenites (sons of Cain, the black oxen) and the Sethites (the white oxen) and that these creatures do not represent natural animals. The Kenites themselves were the product of hybridization between Eve and the serpent and we see that the outcome of these unions was a diverse brood of offspring represented as elephants, camels and asses.

There are other excerpts from Enoch which describe such acts of adulteration but now we will look at a more credible source which echoes similar themes to those found in 1 Enoch: the Dead Sea Scrolls. While highly fragmentary, the text associated with Enochic traditions portrays a narrative of hybridization between the fallen Angels and terrestrial beasts. First reading from 1Q23, fragments 1 and 6:

 “1 [… two hundred] 2 donkeys, two hundred asses, two hund[red … rams of the] 3 flock, two hundred goats, two hundred [… beast of the] 4 field from every animal, from every [bird …] 5 […] for miscegenation […]”.

The references to donkeys, goats and birds may well relate to the onokentauros or sa’iyr and liyliyth mentioned in Isaiah which are associated with these creatures. Now from 4Q531:

“1 […] they defiled […] 2 [… they begot] giants and monsters […] 3 […] they begot, and, behold, all [the earth was corrupted …] 4 […] with its blood and by the hand of […] 5 [giants] which did not suffice for them and […] 6 […] and they were seeking to devour many […]  7 […] 8 the monsters attacked it.” 

And again in 4Q532: 

“2 […] flesh […] 3 al[l …] monsters […] will be […] 4 […] they would arise […] lacking in true knowledge […] because […] 5 […] the earth [grew corrupt …] mighty […] 6 […] they were considering […] 7 […] from the angels upon […] 8 […] in the end it will perish and die […] 9 […] they caused great corruption in the [earth …] 10 [… this did not] suffice to […] 11 they will be […]”.

‘The Fall of the Rebel Angels’ -Pieter Bruegel

The Epistle of St. Jude contains many clear racial themes and he even quotes the original Enoch which is now lost to us. We will now look at a couple verses in particular concerning the fallen Angels:

“6 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains of darkness unto the judgment of the great day.

7 Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.”
-Jude 1

Of course this describes the fornication of the fallen Angels and the corruption of kinds they perpetrated on earth. Notice that their sin in forsaking “their first estate” is connected with the sin of Sodom and Gomorrha in “going after strange flesh” and the result is that they are bound in “chains of darkness”. 

https://emahiser.christogenea.org/angels-sinned-chained-darkness-part-1

Discussing the fate of certain souls, Justin Martyr informs us that those unworthy to see God are “imprisoned in the bodies of certain wild beasts”. This should be compared to 2 Peter 2.12 and Jude 1.10 where certain wicked men are referred to as beasts and are mentioned in connection to the Angels that sinned who are bound in “chains of darkness” (2 Peter 2.4, Jude 1.6).

“Trypho: What, then, is the advantage to those who have seen [God]? Or what has he who has seen more than he who has not seen, unless he remember this fact, that he has seen?

Justin: I cannot tell.

Trypho: And what do those suffer who are judged to be unworthy of this spectacle?

Justin: They are imprisoned in the bodies of certain wild beasts, and this is their punishment.”
-The Dialogue with Trypho, chapter 4, The Soul of Itself Cannot See God

‘Fallen Angels’ 
-Georges Chastellain

In the Pastor of Hermas there are three races of people described allegorically as mountains. One blessed, one sinful but capable of repentance and one beyond salvation. The latter is fittingly described as being dark. This is the fate of those lineages who betray and blaspheme God, to be bound in chains of darkness.

“From the first mountain, which was black, they that believed are the following: apostates and blasphemers against the Lord, and betrayers of the servants of God. To these repentance is not open; but death lies before them, and on this account also are they black, for their race is a lawless one. And from the second mountain, which was bare, they who believed are the following: hypocrites, and teachers of wickedness. And these, accordingly, are like the former, not having any fruits of righteousness; for as their mountain was destitute of fruit, so also such men have a name indeed, but are empty of faith, and there is no fruit of truth in them. They indeed have repentance in their power, if they repent quickly; but if they are slow in so doing, they shall die along with the former.” “Why, sir,” I said, “have these repentance, but the former not? for their actions are nearly the same.” “On this account,” he said, “have these repentance, because they did not blaspheme their Lord, nor become betrayers of the servants of God; but on account of their desire of possessions they became hypocritical, and each one taught according to the desires of men that were sinners. But they will suffer a certain punishment; and repentance is before them, because they were not blasphemers or traitors.”
-The Pastor of Hermas, book 3, Similitudes, Similitude Ninth, The Great Mysteries in the Building of the Militant and Triumphant Church, chapter 19

This greater brood spawned of the fallen Angels is associated with the serpent. Throughout the New Testament the Edomite Judeans are referred to as “offspring (Strong’s G1081) of vipers” (Matthew 3:7, Luke 3.7, Matthew 23:33, 12.34). In Revelation 12 they are the great red dragon and the flood from the mouth of the serpent which tries to sweep away Israel (the woman crowned with twelve stars for the tribes). This describes the centuries long attack on Christendom by the Edomite Jews and their non-Adamic proxy warriors.

https://christreich.christogenea.org/revelation12

https://christogenea.org/essays/immigration-problem-and-biblical-prophecy

‘Satan Before the Lord’ -Corrado Giaquinto

It is a harsh reality, but this is an unavoidable fundamental theme of Scripture which we must come to terms with. In such dire times when the camp of the saints is surrounded we must face this reality. It is the White race who has championed Christ and made Christian living a reality and if we perish Christianity will inevitably perish with us. We must understand the need to be utterly separated from corrupted races of the world until such a time as God judges the earth and establishes the Kingdom.

‘Fornication, Adultery and Idolatry: a Biblical Case Against Miscegenation’

https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/03/06/fornication-adultery-and-idolatry-a-biblical-case-against-miscegenation/

“6And it came to pass on a day, that behold, the angels of God came to stand before the Lord, and the devil came with them. 7And the Lord said to the devil, Whence art thou come? And the devil answered the Lord, and said, I am come from compassing the earth, and walking up and down in the world.” 
-Job 1

“8 Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour:

9 Whom resist stedfast in the faith, knowing that the same afflictions are accomplished in your brethren that are in the world.”
-1 Peter 5

The Satanic Origins of the Kenite, Canaanite and Edomite Jews

Featured
‘Christ Brought Before Caiaphas’, Salvin Hours.

The people who bear the name of Jews today are commonly regarded by the denominational churches as the legitimate and whole chosen people of Scripture. This is of course utterly erroneous on several levels, and here we will expose the nature of these devilish falsehoods. 

The greater portion of Israel never had any part in the tribe of Judah, the Kingdom of Judah or the province of Judaea, and none of them were ever called Jews. The vast majority of the children of Israel left Egypt and Western Asia between 3,600-2,700 years ago to fulfill the promise to Jacob-Israel that his “seed” would “become many nations” and “a company of nations”.

‘The Dispersions of Israel: a Company of Nations’ 
https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/02/10/the-dispersions-of-israel-a-company-of-nations/

‘Scythian Origins: the Lost Tribes in Iran, the Steppe and Europe’ 
https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/02/13/scythian-origins-the-lost-tribes-in-iran-the-steppe-and-europe-2/

‘The Israelite Origins of Europa: the Phoenicians in the West’ 
https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-israelite-origins-of-europa-the-phoenicians-in-the-west/

‘Dardan, Danaan and Dorian Origins: the Mediterranean Migrations of Ancient Israel’
https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/02/13/dardan-danaan-and-dorian-origins-the-mediterranean-migrations-of-israel-2/

‘The New Covenant with Israel’
https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-new-covenant-with-israel/

Nonetheless the prevailing narrative among most Christians today is that the Jews of today are the offspring of Judah, and that this supposed house of Judah is the only remnant of racial Israelites left in the world. 

This of course puzzles many people, for these Jews have historically been enemies of Christianity and every bastion of Christian morality in the West. Could the elect people chosen by God truly be a race of usurers, pornography producers, human traffickers, blasphemers, blood drinkers, thieves, and ritual murderers? 

https://christogenea.org/podcasts/protocols-of-satan

https://christogenea.org/articles/jewish-ritual-murder

A woodcut from the Nuremberg Chronicle depicting the ritual murder of an Italian boy.

Most certainly not. The Jews of today are neither Judahites nor Israelites but are a racial conglomeration of Kenites, Canaanites and Edomites. They are primarily descended from the Edomites who were conquered converted and integrated into Judaea in 125 BC by John Hyrcanus.

This is attested to in Josephus’ Antiquities of the Judeans, (13:257-258, 13:395-397 et al.) and Strabo’s Geography (book 16) as well as later sources such as the Biblical Encyclopedia, Vol. 2. Here are a few notable references:

“257Hyrcanus took also Dora and Marissa, cities of Idumea [formerly cities of Manasseh and Judah respectively], and subdued all the Idumeans; and permitted them to stay in that country, if they would circumcise their genitals, and make use of the laws of the Judeans; 258and they were so desirous of living in the country of their forefathers, that they submitted to the use of circumcision, and of the rest of the Judean ways of living; at which time therefore this befell them, that they were hereafter no other than Judeans.”
-Josephus, Antiquities of the Judeans, 13.257-258

“34 As for Judaea, its western extremities towards Casius are occupied by the Idumaeans and by the lake. The Idumaeans are Nabataeans, but owing to a sedition they were banished from there, joined the Judaeans, and shared in the same customs with them.”
-Strabo, Geography, 16.2.34

“Indeed the Edomites later became completely absorbed in Jewry and under their aggressive intrusion the Jews became racially the medium of expression for the Edomite ideal for which Herod the Great had first given political formation. The Edomite intrusion into Judaism at every historical point of contact is fully discussed in the volumes of the Cambridge Ancient History.”
-Biblica Encyclopedia, vol. 2, col. 1187

‘The Arrest of Christ’ -Hans Holbein the Elder.

King Herod and the entire Herodian dynasty were Edomites by race, and this is affirmed many times in the writings of Flavius Josephus (Antiquities 14.3, 12.8 et al.). These Edomites had risen to the peaks of power in Judaea through murder of the Hasmonean dynasty and by bribing Mark Antony. 

These Edomites were ancestral foes of Israel who had mingled with the cursed Canaanites who in turn had mingled with the Kenites (the offspring of Cain and the mysterious women of Nod), the Rephaim (giants descended from the Nephilim), the Kadmonites, the Perizzites and other cursed tribes without a lineage from Seth.

‘Adam: The Patriarch of One Race’ https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/adam-the-patriarch-of-one-race/

‘The Origins of the Serpent Seed’ 
https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-origins-of-the-serpent-seed/

‘The Origins of the Non-Adamic Races’
https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/02/02/the-origins-of-the-non-adamic-races/

For an understanding of where God stands concerning Esau-Edom see Malachi 1:2-3 and the book of Obadiah. The Edomites are one of the most cursed tribes of Scripture and their eventual utter destruction is prophecied throughout the writings of the prophets.

‘Christ Mocked (The Crowning with Thorns)’
Pietro della Vecchia

The Edomites descended from Abraham’s race-mixing grandson Esau, and on their maternal side they descended from a conglomeration of non-Adamic tribes which the Edomites had been joined to since their first generation. Esau-Edom had fallen from a high place as the firstborn of Isaac to a lowly place as the most despised nation of Scripture because of his fornication. 

‘Fornication, Adultery and Idolatry: a Biblical Case Against Miscegenation’https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/03/06/fornication-adultery-and-idolatry-a-biblical-case-against-miscegenation/

The Edomites were of a vile spirit after their profane, idolatrous fornicating ancestors and so they would naturally be opposed to the gospel of Christ, but they had other reasons for despising Christ’s ministry.

The Edomites had only recently solidified their power in Judaea but were well on their way to complete racial and political domination. Esau has long coveted Jacob’s covenant with God, and has constantly sought to do harm to Israel.

“41And Esau was angry with Jacob because of the blessing, with which his father blessed him; and Esau said in his mind, Let the days of my father’s mourning draw nigh, that I may slay my brother Jacob.”
-Genesis 27

A religious reformation in Judaea threatened their newly found dominance of Judaeanism and all they had murdered and bribed to achieve. Thus these infiltrators were zealous enemies of Christ and his followers by necessity.

These Edomitish enemies of Christ are the false Judaeans which John warned the assembly at Smyrna about in Revelation 2.9 and 3.9:

“I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Judeans, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.”
-Revelation 2.9

“Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Judeans, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.”
-Revelation 3.9

There is only one people who gathers in synagogues and who claim to be Judaeans. Thus the identity of the guilty party is obvious.

‘The Judas Kiss’ -Gustave Dore.

Throughout the New Testament these Edomite Judaeans are referred to as “offspring (Strong’s G1081) of vipers” (Matthew 3:7, Luke 3.7, Matthew 23:33 etc.). This is a clear reference to Genesis 3.15:

“15 I will put enmities between thee (the serpent) and the woman, and thy seed and her seed: she shall crush thy head, and thou shalt lie in wait for her heel.”
-Genesis 3

In Matthew 23.35 Christ accuses their race (genean, Strong’s G1074) of the spilled blood of Abel:

“29 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous,

30 And say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets.

31 Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets.

32 Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers.

33 Ye serpents, ye offspring [G1081] of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?

34 Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes: and some of them ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute them from city to city:

35 That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.

36 Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this race [genean, G1074].”
-Matthew 23

‘The Crucifixion’, the Stammheim Missal.

The Scriptures do not inform us of how the prophets each died, but on occasions when the priests of God are murdered we see characters such as Jezebel the Canaanitess or Doeg the Edomite responsible.

Christ holds their race responsible for all the righteous blood shed upon the earth from Abel unto Zacharias, the father of John the Baptist. This links one race from Cain in Eden to the 1st century Judaeans. 

Christ was speaking to the scribes and Pharisees. The Pharisees were a mix of Israelites and Edomites like the rest of the 1st century Judaeans, but the scribes may have had among them Kenites, as some Kenites (sons of Cain) had been employed as scribes by the Judahites even before the Edomites began to be absorbed into Judaea (1 Chronicles 2.55).

Even in more ancient times the Israelite tribes of Judah, Benjamin and Levi that would form the Kingdom of Judah had struggled with miscegenation and cohabitation with the Kenites and Canaanites. In Genesis 38.1-5 we read that Judah married Shuah, A Canaanitess who bore him three mongrel sons, Er, Onan and Shelah. While Er and Onan were both slain by God, Shelah lived and his descendants remained among Judah as we see in Numbers 26.20.

Only thanks to the wit of Tamar did Judah have Adamic posterity and we see that the sons of Tamar were counted as the first and second born of Judah. This is despite the fact that Shelah was their elder brother, proving the illegitimate status of the Canaanite mongrel. In Judges 1.16-21 we find that Moses erred in marrying a Kenite woman and that the Kenites dwelt in the South of the land of Judah. There we also see that the Canaanite tribe of the Jebusites settled among the tribe of Benjamin in Jerusalem and we find in Joshua 15.63 that these Jebusites remained there until the time of Moses.

‘The Arrest of Christ and the Kiss of Judas’
-Lippo Memmi.

It is now necessary to make a small digression concerning the relatives of Moses. There is some confusion among Biblical scholars concerning certain names found in the Old Testament applied to Moses’ relatives. In the book of Exodus we read of Moses’ father in law, the priest of Midian (Exodus 2.16-18), and a Midianite by race (Numbers 10.29). In their strict adherence to the Masoretic Text of the Jews many scholars have errantly associated Jethro the Midianite with another figure; Moses’ Kenite father in law. This has led to many confused attempts to explain how Jethro could be both a Midianite and a Kenite. They also try to assign three different names found in the Masoretic Text to the single figure of Jethro which seems quite implausible. 

In truth Jethro was only known by one other name; Raguel. This is evident in Exodus 2.16-18 in the Septuagint where he is refered to by both names in the same passage and Numbers 10.29 where Raguel is called the father in law of Moses and a Midianite. In Numbers 10.29 in the Masoretic Text and the Vulgate Jethro/Raguel is named as the father of Hobab. At Judges 4.11 in the Masoretic Text Hobab is refered to as a Kenite and the father in law of Moses. One might conclude based on this that Jethro was also a Kenite and known by a third name, Hobab, but this is in conflict with the fact that Jethro is elsewhere refered to as a Midianite. The reconciliation is to be found in the Septuagint where Judges 4.11 has Jobab and not Hobab, thus we may conclude that the Hobab descended from Jethro/Raguel was a Midianite and unrelated to this Jobab the Kenite whose daughter Moses errantly wed. 

The Kenites had become absorbed into the Canaanite nations at an early time, and Esau-Edom had become absorbed partially into the Canaanites, thus all three tribal groups carried some of Cain’s DNA. It is also likely that many of the Judaean elders were Canaanites themselves (Zechariah 14.21, Susanna 1.56) and so it’s possible all three cursed lineages had direct descendants in the 1st century Judaean populace, particularly among scribes and Pharisees. Thus Christ rightly accuses their brood of shedding the blood of Abel and Zacharias, and of all the righteous priests of God.

‘Massacre of the Innocents’
-Matteo di Giovanni

In John chapter 8 Christ tells this race in no uncertain terms that they are descended from the Devil:

“38 I speak that which I have seen with my Father: and ye do that which ye have seen with your father.

39 They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father [the Edomites and bastardized Judahites indeed descended paternally from Abraham]. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham’s children, ye would do the works of Abraham.

40 But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham.

41 Ye do the deeds of your father. Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication; we have one Father, even God.

42 Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me.

43 Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my Word.

44 Ye are of your father the Devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.”
-John 8

‘Christ Before Caiaphas’ -Albrecht Durer.

After Jesus states that they have a different father than his own and that theirs is the Devil these Judaeans are immediately defensive saying “we are not born of fornication”. This indicates that they well knew that he was referring to their ancestry. He continues to affirm his accusation by saying that their father is the father of lies and a murderer from the beginning. These Judaean’s denial of their bastardized heritage in verse 41 is a reference to Malachi 2 where we find that Judah has married the daughter of a strange God.

“10Have we not all one father? hath not one God created us? why then doth every one of us despise his brother, violating the covenant of our fathers? 

11Juda hath transgressed, and abomination hath been committed in Israel, and in Jerusalem: for Juda hath profaned the holiness of the Lord, which he loved, and hath married the daughter of a strange god. 

12The Lord will cut off the man that hath done this, both the master, and the scholar, out of the tabernacles of Jacob, and him that offereth an offering to the Lord of hosts.”
-Malachi 2

‘The Kiss of Judas’ -Ary Scheffer.

This of course refers to the mingling of the sons of Judah with the daughters of Canaan who indeed descended in part from the devil’s brood. Thus Jesus rightly tells them they do the deeds of their father the devil. One may descend paternally from the patriarchs but if one is born of fornication they are cut off and belong to the devil.

‘Fornication, Adultery and Idolatry: a Biblical Case Against Miscegenation’https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/03/06/fornication-adultery-and-idolatry-a-biblical-case-against-miscegenation/

In Romans chapter 9 Paul discusses these circumstances concerning the Edomites at some length. He first expresses his concern “for the brethren” his “kinsmen in regards to the flesh: those who are Israelites” in verses 1-5.

“I speak the truth among the Anointed, I lie not, my conscience bearing witness with me in the Holy Spirit, 2 that grief for me is great, and distress incessant in my heart, 3 for I have prayed that I myself would be accursed from the Anointed for the brethren, my kinsmen in regards to the flesh; 4 those who are Israelites, whose is the position of sons, and the honor, and the covenants, and the legislation, and the service, and the promises; 5 whose are the fathers; and of whom are the Anointed in regards to the flesh, being over all blessed of God for the ages. Truly.”
-Romans 9

He then goes on to say that “not all those who are from Israel are those of Israel” in verse 6 and relates this to the enduring posterity of Isaac which was found not in Esau but Jacob who diligently sought a Shemitic wife while Esau married Canaanites.

Da Vinci’s ‘The Last Supper’-Giacomo Raffaelli.

“34And Esau was forty years old; and he took to wife Judith the daughter of Beoch the Chettite, and Basemath, daughter of Helon the Chettite. 35And they were provoking to Isaac and Rebecca.”
-Genesis 26

In his epistle to the Hebrews St. Paul describes Esau as a fornicator and profane person. His act of fornication was miscegenation and he is never recorded as having had extramarital or incestuous sexual relations. Rather his marriages themselves were condemned because his wives were taken of the mongrel Canaanites.

“14 Follow peace with all men, and holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord:

15 Looking diligently lest any man fail of the grace of God; lest any root of bitterness springing up trouble you, and thereby many be defiled;

16 Lest there be any fornicator, or profane person, as Esau, who for one morsel of meat sold his birthright.”
-Hebrews 12

Rebecca was so distraught she saw no worth in her life if Jacob would marry racial aliens like Esau did.

“46And Rebecca said to Isaac, I am weary of my life, because of the daughters of the sons of Chet; if Jacob shall take a wife of the daughters of this land, wherefore should I live?”
-Genesis 27

At Isaac’s behest Jacob went to his uncle Laban (meaning “White”) in Mesopotamia to find a kindred wife who would bear the children of the promise.

“1And Isaac having called for Jacob, blessed him, and charged him, saying, Thou shalt not take a wife of the daughters of the Chananites. 2Rise and depart quickly into Mesopotamia, to the house of Bathuel the father of thy mother, and take to thyself thence a wife of the daughters of Laban thy mother’s brother. 3And may my God bless thee, and increase thee, and multiply thee, and thou shalt become gatherings of nations.”
-Genesis 28

‘The Mockery of Christ’ -Ol auf Holz.

The children of the flesh in verse 8 are contrasted with the children of the promise which the following verses show to be inherited by birth through Isaac and Jacob. 

“6 Not, however, that the word of God has failed; since not all those who are from Israel are those of Israel: 7 nor because they are offspring of Abraham all children: but, “In Isaac will your offspring be called.” 8 That is to say, the children of the flesh, these are not children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as offspring. 9 Indeed this word of promise: “At the appointed time I will come, and there will be a son for Sarah.” 10 And not only, but Rebecca also had conceived from one, by Isaac our father. 11 Then not yet having been born, nor having performed any good or evil, (that the purpose of God concerning the chosen endures, not from rituals, but from the calling,) 12 to her it was said, “the elder will serve the younger:” 13 just as it is written, “Jacob I love, and Esau I hated.”
-Romans 9

Some will say that those who Paul says are not of Israel in the land of Israel are actually just Israelites whose status as such has been revoked on account of disbelief, but another passage of Romans refutes this notion.

“25 For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the nations be come in.

26 And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:

27 For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins.

28 As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the father’s sakes.

29 For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance.”
-Romans 11

So we see that even those Israelites who reject the Gospel are still beloved for the father’s sakes and are not cast off from the election. Thus those in Israel who are not of Israel can only be the Edomite and Kenite infiltrators.

‘Judas Iscariot’ -Andre Duterte.

He continues to contrast Jacob-Israel and Esau-Edom in the following verses of chapter 9. In verse 22 he calls these Edomites and other enemies of God “vessels fit for destruction”. Clearly Paul well knew the heritage of his Edomite adversaries.

In 1 John 2 John warns his readers of the anti-Christs. Notice that the anti-Christs have already been born (ginomai, G1096) and that they came out from us but were not of us. This perfectly describes the Kenites, Edomites and mixed Judaeans. These came out from Eve, Abraham, Isaac and even Judah, Benjamin and Levi, but were not truly of us on account of their spurious origins. Of course these anti-Christs deny that Jesus is the Christ and so deny the Father and the Son. To this day their denial defines their Satanic ethno-religion.

“18 Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now many antichrists have been born; whereby we know that it is the last time.

19 They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us.

20 But ye have an unction from the Holy One, and ye know all things.

21 I have not written unto you because ye know not the truth, but because ye know it, and that no lie is of the truth.

22 Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son.” 
-1 John 2

‘The Kiss of Judas’ -Ol auf Holz.

It is evident in numerous places all throughout the prophets and the New Testament that trees, vines and other plant life symbolize people, families, nations and races. I hope to have established this idiom in other writings.

‘The Origins of the Serpent Seed’https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-origins-of-the-serpent-seed/

Jeremiah prophecied of the corruption of the stock of Judaea in chapter 24. Here the prophet refers to the Edomites and halfbreeds of Judaea as “bad figs” and the Israelites of Judaea as “good figs”. 

“1The Lord shewed me two baskets of figs, lying in front of the temple of the Lord, after Nabuchodonosor king of Babylon had carried captive Jechonias son of Joakim king of Juda, and the princes, and the artificers, and the prisoners, and the rich men out of Jerusalem, and had brought them to Babylon. 2The one basket was full of very good figs, as the early figs; and the other basket was full of very bad figs, which could not be eaten, for their badness. 3And the Lord said to me, What seest thou, Jeremias? and I said, Figs; the good figs, very good; and the bad, very bad, which cannot be eaten, for their badness.

4And the word of the Lord came to me, saying, 5Thus saith the Lord, the God of Israel; As these good figs, so will I acknowledge the Judeans that have been carried away captive, whom I have sent forth out of this place into the land of the Chaldeans for good. 6And I will fix mine eyes upon them for good, and I will restore them into this land for good: and I will build them up, and not pull them down; and I will plant them, and not pluck them up. 7And I will give them a heart to know me, that I am the Lord: and they shall be to me a people, and I will be to them a God: for they shall turn to me with all their heart.

8And as the bad figs, which cannot be eaten, for their badness; thus saith the Lord, So will I deliver Sedekias king of Juda, and his nobles, and the remnant of Jerusalem, them that are left in this land, and the dwellers in Egypt. 9And I will cause them to be dispersed into all the kingdoms of the earth, and they shall be for a reproach, and a proverb, and an object of hatred, and a curse, in every place whither I have driven them out.”
-Jeremiah 24

‘The Disembowelment of Judas’ 
-Giovanni Canavesio.

The prophet Jeremiah speaks here of “the remnant of Jerusalem, them that are left in this land, and the dwellers in Egypt.” These are Judaeans who evaded the Babylonian captivity and remained in Judaea and neighbouring regions. 

They came to be overwhelmed by the Edomites, Canaanites and others who moved into the lands of Israel and Judah after they were deported by the Assyrians and Babylonians. 

The result was a nation partially comprised of paganized and racially impure Judaeans. These events predate even the Edomite conversion to Judaism in 125 BC. The fornication and heresy of Judah was known well to the prophet:

“20For of old thou hast broken thy yoke, and plucked asunder thy bands; and thou has said, I will not serve thee, but will go upon every high hill, and under every shady tree, there will I indulge in my fornication.

21Yet I planted thee a fruitful vine, entirely of the right sort: how art thou a strange vine turned to bitterness!

22Though thou shouldest wash thyself with nitre, and multiply to thyself soap, still thou art stained by thine iniquities before me, saith the Lord.”
-Jeremiah 2

These” bad figs” of Judah and the vision of Jeremiah are alluded to again in the New Testament when Christ twice cursed the fig tree upon finding the temple turned into a “den of theives” (Mark 11:12–14, 11:20–25, Matthew 21:18–22).

‘Judas’ Betrayal’, St. Clement Church, Ohrid, Macedonia.

The Edomites were found to have been in league with the Babylonian forces when they besieged Jerusalem. (Psalm 137:7-9; 1 Esdras 4:45 in the Septuagint). No doubt they were desirous of the land and cities of Judah and probably hoped the Babylonians would make their intrusion easier. 

The Edomite’s conspiracy to inhabit the land of Israel was spoken of by the prophet Ezekiel in chapter 35 of his prophecy. Here we see they have conspired with Israel’s captors so they may inhabit the land and that God has promised to punish them severely for this.

“5Because thou hast been a perpetual enemy, and hast laid wait craftily for the house of Israel, with the hand of enemies with a sword, in the time of injustice, at the last: 6Therefore, as I live, saith the Lord God, verily thou hast sinned even to blood, therefore blood shall pursue thee. 7And I will make mount Seir a waste, and desolate, and I will destroy from off it men and cattle: 8and I will fill thy hills and thy valleys with slain men, and in all thy plains there shall fall in thee men slain with the sword. 9I will make thee a perpetual desolation, and thy cities shall not be inhabited any more: and thou shalt know that I am the Lord. 10Because thou saidst, The two nations and the two countries shall be mine, and I shall inherit them; whereas the Lord is there: 11therefore, as I live, saith the Lord, I will even deal with thee according to thine enmity, and I will be made known to thee when I shall judge thee: 12and thou shalt know that I am the Lord. I have heard the voice of thy blasphemies, whereas thou hast said, The desert mountains of Israel are given to us for food; 13and thou hast spoken swelling words against me with thy mouth: I have heard them. 14Thus saith the Lord; When all the earth is rejoicing, I will make thee desert. 15Thou shalt be desert, O mount Seir, and all Idumea; and it shall be utterly consumed: and thou shalt know that I am the Lord their God.”
-Ezekiel 35

They achieved their desire and the southern portion of the land of Judaea was known in Hellenistic and Roman times as Idumaea or Edom. The devil Judas Iscariot (according to Christ himself in John 6.70) who betrayed the Christ was from Kerioth in Idumaea.

‘Ecce Homo’ -Andrea Mantegna

To this day the devils cling to the land they have fought so hard to gain through bribery and murder and this is manifest in modern Zionism. Of this Malachi prophecied saying:

“2I have loved you, saith the Lord. And ye said, Wherein hast thou loved us? Was not Esau Jacob’s brother? saith the Lord: yet I loved Jacob, 3and hated Esau and laid waste his borders, and made his heritage as dwellings of the wilderness? 4Because one will say, Idumea has been overthrown, but let us return and rebuild the desolate places; thus saith the Lord Almighty, They shall build, but I will throw down; and they shall be called The borders of wickedness, and, The people against whom the Lord has set himself for ever.”
-Malachi 1

Millennia ago the Edomites were consorting with the Babylonians against Judah, bribing the Romans for client kingship and assassinating the Hasmoneans to gain a death grip on ancient Judaeanism and to establish themselves in the land of Canaan. Today they drive the Zionist war machine for the very same purpose: to pose as Israel and steal his birthright. Try as they may, God has spoken: “they shall build, but I shall throw down”.

This has hardly been a comprehensive treatment of this topic which one might easily write about for a good deal of time, but I hope to have here given a sufficient introduction to the topic.

“Jews began to call themselves Hebrews and Israelites in 1860”
-Encyclopedia Judaica 1971, 10:23

“Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an Ancient Israelite a Jew or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew.”
-1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3

“The modern Jew is the product of the Talmud.” -Michael Rodkinson, in preface of Babylonian Talmud, p. 11

“Pharisaism shaped the character of Judaism and the life and thought of the Jew for all the future.” 
-Isidore Singer, The Jewish Encyclopedia, 9:665-666

‘The Arrest of Christ’, the Book of Kells.

“5My sword has been made drunk in heaven: behold, it shall come down upon Idumea, and with judgment upon the people doomed to destruction.

6The sword of the Lord is filled with blood, it is glutted with fat, with the blood of goats and lambs, and with the fat of goats and rams: for the Lord has a sacrifice in Bosor, and a great slaughter in Idumea.

7And the mighty ones shall fall with them, and the rams and the bulls; and the land shall be soaked with blood, and shall be filled with their fat.

8For it is the day of judgment of the Lord, and the year of the recompence of Sion in judgment.”
-Isaiah 34

“1Who is this that is come from Edom, with red garments from Bosor? thus fair in his apparel, with mighty strength? I speak of righteousness and saving judgment.

2Wherefore are thy garments red, and thy raiment as if fresh from a trodden winepress?

3I am full of trodden grape, and of the nations there is not a man with me; and I trampled them in my fury, and dashed them to pieces as earth, and brought down their blood to the earth.

4For the day of recompence has come upon them, and the year of redemption is at hand.

5And I looked, and there was no helper; and I observed, and none upheld: therefore my arm delivered them, and mine anger drew nigh.

6And I trampled them in mine anger, and brought down their blood to the earth.”
-Isaiah 63

“16For as you have drunk upon my holy mountain, so all nations shall drink continually: and they shall drink, and sup up, and they shall be as though they were not.

17And in mount Sion shall be salvation, and it shall be holy, and the house of Jacob shall possess those that possessed them.

18And the house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame, and the house of Esau stubble: and they shall be kindled in them, and shall devour them: and there shall be no remains of the house of Esau, for the Lord hath spoken it.”
-Obadiah

“1For, behold, a day comes burning as an oven, and it shall consume them; and all the racial aliens [allogenes, Strong’s G241], and all that do wickedly, shall be stubble: and the day that is coming shall set them on fire, saith the Lord Almighty, and there shall not be left of them root or branch. 2But to you that fear my name shall the Sun of righteousness arise, and healing shall be in his wings: and ye shall go forth, and bound as young calves let loose from bonds. 3And ye shall trample the wicked; for they shall be ashes underneath your feet in the day which I appoint, saith the Lord Almighty.”
-Malachi 4

The Christian Answer to the Jewish Question

Jews burned alive for the host desecration in Deggendorf, Bavaria in 1338, and in Sternberg, Mecklenburg in 1492, a woodcut from the Nuremberg Chronicle, Liber Chronicarum.

Unfortunately we White Christians are a gullible lot. For the most part we are too innocent or naive for us to grasp the treacherous nature of the devils among us or to anticipate their sheer depravity. Normal God-fearing folks are often baffled when they learn of such evils as gender theory, the push for the acceptance of “minor attracted persons”, increasingly liberal abortion laws, the vast amounts of tax dollars spent on “refugees” and other aspects of Western immigration policies which favour those hostile to Western culture at the expense of the European founding stock. It simply never crosses their mind that such things would be allowed to grow into real movements and public agendas.

If more Christians investigated the Scriptures thoroughly we would know that Scripture warns us of many of these evils. Homophilia (inextricably linked with pederastry through all of ancient history), miscegenation, general sexual promiscuity and multiculturalism are all things Scripture has clearly warned us against. If we heeded these warnings we would be in a much better place. Christians in recent times have been taught to focus on the positive messages of Scripture and to ignore the grim warnings and prophecies which ought to temper the naivety that a sheltered Christian upbringing might otherwise cause. 

Scripture has made it amply clear in both the Old and New Testaments that homophilia is a grevious sin along with all other forms of sexual deviancy such as miscegenation and extra-marital affairs. These sins all fall under the Biblical term “fornication” which is frequently condemned in Scripture. Fittingly these sins are consistently associated with the alien Canaanite peoples surrounding the nation of Israel. The pagan cults of Canaan were inextricably linked to sexual deviancy in the form of fertility rites and temple prostitution of both women and men.

https://christogenea.org/essays/broken-cisterns

‘Fornication, Adultery and Idolatry: a Biblical Case Against Miscegenation’
https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/03/06/fornication-adultery-and-idolatry-a-biblical-case-against-miscegenation/

As in Biblical times, these sins can be traced to these same racially alien peoples who have never ceased to plague us. The Jewish forces of multiculturalism and sexual immorality can be traced directly to the ancient enemies of Israel through Cain, Canaan and Esau and today their agenda has changed surprisingly little. Even the sin of abortion come may come down to us from the fallen Angels according to the apocryphal book I Enoch (69.12) and parrallels may be drawn to the pagan Canaanite practice of child sacrifice described throughout Scripture.

‘The Satanic Origins of the Kenite, Canaanite and Edomite Jews’
https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-satanic-origins-of-the-edomite-jews/

These devil’s endeavour to propagate these sinful ways to Israel has always hinged upon their ability to infiltrate our society through mingling and intermarrying with our people. The Canaanite plot to become mingled with Israel is described plainly first in Genesis 34.

“20And Emmor and Sychem his son came to the gate of their city, and spoke to the men of their city, saying, 21These men are peaceable, let them dwell with us upon the land, and let them trade in it, and behold the land is extensive before them; we will take their daughters to us for wives, and we will give them our daughters. 22Only on these terms will the men conform to us to dwell with us so as to be one people, if every male of us be circumcised, as they also are circumcised. 23And shall not their cattle and their herds, and their possessions, be ours? only in this let us conform to them, and they will dwell with us.”
-Genesis 34

This agenda has never ceased even until today. We see clear examples of it’s continuance among our current elites such as Donald Trump offering his daughter to the Edomite Jew Jared Kushner who now stands as his adviser. Under Trump “Zionism” has thrived and the Jewish state has recieved more support than ever before from the pockets of American citizens. In Canada our Prime Minister Justin Trudeau descends from the union of the Sephardic Jew Fidel Castro with the wife of Pierre Trudeau, Margaret, and this bastard eagerly hands over Canadian wealth to invaders. Surely our possessions have become their’s through such abominable unions.

Under Edomite Jewish influence our societies have even begun to persecute Christianity. In recent times here in Canada Christian preachers have been arrested simply for preaching the Biblical truth about the sin of homophilia, and it is only a matter of time before we become persecuted for upholding other basic tenants of Christian doctrine. Already Christians are being forced to accept mass Muslim and assorted heathen immigration as well as abortion and homophilia. Consider the case of Ellinor Grimmark, a Christian midwife in Sweden who had to find work outside of Sweden because she refused to participate in abortions.

Recently in German universities Christian groups were denied use of campus facilities, accreditation by student councils, and were prohibited from handing out flyers. The British Pharmaceutical Council published in 2017 new professional standards that state, in some circumstances, pharmacists were expected to dispense a drug against his or her conscience, meaning that a pharmacist who does not wish to issue an abortifacient drug cannot even refer the patient to another colleague. 

Once the agenda of mass immigration has altered the demographics of Western nations enough they will undoubtedly begin to openly seek our destruction. In the coming years we should not be surprised if these devils begin to slaughter the faithful of God just as Doeg the Edomite in the days of Saul. The Edomite Jew’s ambition to destroy Israel is nothing new and we see in Scripture that the Edomites were complicit in the destruction of Jerusalem by the Babylonians (Psalm 137:7-9; 1 Esdras 4:45 in the Septuagint).

There is a simple solution to fighting these evil forces; an adherence to the laws of God. Scriptural Christian morality regards as sin all the things that Edomite Jewry thrives on. Christianity forbids usury, “pharmakeia” (drugs and related sorcery), fornication (miscegenation, homophilia, pederastry etc.), wrathfullness (the cause of brother wars) and it teaches us to care for our own house first, which means defending Christendom and the posterity of the children of God by whatever means necessary. 

It teaches us not to cast pearls before swine or to give the children’s bread to dogs (missionaries to demonic races, foreign aid, refugee benefits etc.). It teaches us that we are to separate completely from all the evils of the world and fulfill our role as a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation and a peculiar people (1 Peter 2.9). This moral code, if properly adhered to, renders all the methods of Edomite Jewry powerless in Christendom.

If we forsake greed and the lust for wealth the Jew can not possibly hold us under the sway of his usury. If we deny lust the Jew cannot sell us pornography and turn our daughters into harlots. If we reject fornication the Jew cannot poison our bloodlines with the inferior races. If we turn aside from what is worldly and become a people apart the lesser races cannot swarm us and abuse us. 

If we treat each other with kindness and love the Jew can not turn us on each other in wrath. If we work hard and share our bounty with each other the Jew can peddle no material goods to us. If we reject unbelievers and bastards our society will be strong and united. If we expel the anti-Christs from our midst there will be no Edomite Jews among us at all to propagate these sins in our society. 

“14 If my people (Israel), which are called by my name (Christian/Anointed), shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.”
-2 Chronicles 7

The Pagan Practices of the Israelite Dispersions

‘Adoration of the Golden Calf’
-Andrea di Lione

One of the most common themes of Scripture is the idolatry of Israel. The Israelites were very prone to idolatry and at any point in their history many of the Israelites were doubtless practicing pagans. The pagan gods and practices of Europe are often helpful in identifying the Israelites as many of them point back to the lands of the Scriptures.

The Celtic god Bel is likely a parrallel to one of the Baal’s of Canaan whom the Israelites worshiped and the Beltane rites reflect those devoted to the Baal’s in ancient Canaan. Even today in some parts of the British Isles Beltane festivals continue the practice of passage through fire.

The British Islands are famous for their megaliths. Particularly cromlechs which are rings of standing stones with an altar or pillar in the centre. These are not unique to Britain and the same structures have been found at Byblos and Gylgal in Palestine.

The Irish used to call the altars Bothal, and in North-West Semitic languages they are called Bethel. They are mentioned several times in Scripture and God foretold that the dispersed Israelites would build such structures in Jeremiah 31.21.While not the direct object of this discussion, it can be established that the ancient Phoenicians of early Greek literature were one and the same race of people as the Israelites of Canaan, speaking the same tongue and living in the same lands.

‘The Israelite Origins of Europa: the Phoenicians in the West’

https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-israelite-origins-of-europa-the-phoenicians-in-the-west/

Just as the Israelites of Scripture the Phoenicians were frequent idolaters but also worshiped a supreme deity El which is an epithet of YHVH. While they also worshiped the very same Baal and Astarte of the Scriptures they always continued to hail El as the king of the gods. These are of course the same religious practices as those of ancient Israel.

It may come as a surprise to many Europeans to find that their continent was named after an Israelite but Europa herself was surely a Phoenician by all Greek accounts. She is consistently mentioned as immediate kin of Phoenix himself.

Many other ancient Hellenic heroes, gods and demigods are of Israelite-Phoenician origin including Heracles, Dionysus, Semele, the Cabiri, Oedipus, Phoenix, Minos, Sarpedon, Rhadamanthys, Phineus and Adonis among others.

The Trojans were also considered close relatives of the Phoenicians. Cadmus “the Phoenician” who founded Thebes was said to be the brother in law of Dardanos the Trojan patriarch. While beyond the scope of this discussion, it can be established that Dardanos and his brother Calchal were sons of Zerah son of Judah.

All of these interrelated tribes have an ancient connection to Crete which served as a waypoint for settlement from elsewhere in the Eastern Mediterranean. There dwelt at various times Minoan-Philistines, Ionian-Javanites, Dardanian-Judahites, Danaan-Danites, and Dorian and Phoenician-Israelites all partaking in bull worship just as did the Israelites of the Exodus.

‘Dardan, Danaan and Dorian Origins: the Mediterranean Migrations of Ancient Israel’

https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/02/13/dardan-danaan-and-dorian-origins-the-mediterranean-migrations-of-israel-2/

The Trojans, though their ancestors had partaken in such idolatry, never forgot their chief God, YHWH. They always remembered him as Jove (aka Jupiter, a contraction of Jove Pater), the king of the gods and never ceased their sacrifices to him. In ancient Latin, with a soft J and a soft V, Jove is pronounced almost identically to YHWH (Ioue, or Iaoue according to Greek Christian sources).

The goddess Astarte/Ishtar worshiped by the Israelites in Scripture was associated with fertility and sexual rites in the Near East and the Germanic goddess Eostre too is associated with fertility. Astarte is commonly identified as the Queen of Heaven in Mesopotamian texts and is also mentioned by that title in Jeremiah 7.18 where we find that the Israelite women are making special cakes for Astarte. Germanic women likewise made cakes in celebration of pagan Easter festivities. Astarte was regarded by the Greeks as parallel to their own Aphrodite, and likewise they connected Baal with their own Zeus.

Odin was a Germanic war god, and the Assyrians and Babylonians had a war god known as Adon. The Babylonian Adon was the god of wine and in the Norse Elder Edda we are told that Odin ate no food but wine: “The illustrious father of armies, with his own hand, fattens his two wolves; but the victorious Odin takes no other nourishment to himself than what arises from the unintermittent quaffing of wine. For ’tis with wine alone that Odin in arms renowned is nourished forever.”

As Odin had a son called Thor, so the Assyrian Adon had a son called Thouros (Cedrenus, vol. 1, p. 29). The name Thouros seems just to be another form of zoro, or doro, meaning, ‘the seed.’ So Odin’s son, Thor, is an exact parallel to the Assyrian god Adon’s son Thouros. Of course the pagan Israelites of the Assyrian captivity no doubt were influenced by their captors and so we find Assyrian and Babylonian gods among the pantheons of Europe.

‘Scythian Origins: the Lost Tribes in Iran, the Steppe and Europe’

https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/02/13/scythian-origins-the-lost-tribes-in-iran-the-steppe-and-europe-2/

Herodotus informs us that the Scythians regarded swine as unclean, declining to use them for sacrifice or to raise them (The Histories 4.63). Likewise the Greeks of Comana, Pontus considered swine unclean and would not allow it to enter the city (Geography, 12.8.9).

The Persians were cousins of the Israelites and descendants of the Shemitic patriarch Elam. The Persians continued to deal extensively both with the Scythian-Israelites and the portion of Judah who remained in Canaan. The latter would later be liberated from Babylonian rule by the Aryan king Cyrus the Great.The ancient Zoroastrian religion of Iran is monotheistic and has clear affinities with Christianity and ancient Israelism.

Both religions worship a singular highest God (YHWH to the Israelites, Ahura Mazda to the Zoroastrians) who reigns over his Heavenly Host. Both religions feature the motif of the primordial battle between good and evil and both religions represented their God with a winged solar disc called Faravahar by the Zoroastrians and called the Sun of righteousness in Scripture (Malachi 4.2, also featured on the seal of King Hezekia of Judah).

Given the timeline it seems highly probable that the rejuvenation of Zoroastrianism in Iran was influenced by the Scythian Israelites from whom sprang the Parthians and many of the Sassanians who both practiced Zoroastrianism.

‘Zoroastrian and Christian Parrallels’

https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/zoroastrian-and-christian-parrallels/

The Serpent Race in the Gospel of Matthew

‘Massacre of the Innocents’
-Matteo di Giovanni

In recent writings I have endeavoured to illustrate that the events of Genesis chapters 1-3 represent the creation of the children of God, and the corruption of that creation by Satan. This culminates in the conflict of Genesis 3.15:

“15 I will put enmities between thee and the woman, and thy seed and her seed: she shall crush thy head, and thou shalt lie in wait for her heel.”
-Genesis 3

‘Adam: The Patriarch of One Race’

https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/adam-the-patriarch-of-one-race/

‘The Origins of the Serpent Seed’

https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-origins-of-the-serpent-seed/

‘The Satanic Origins of the Kenite, Canaanite and Edomite Jews’

https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-satanic-origins-of-the-edomite-jews/

‘Fornication, Adultery and Idolatry: a Biblical Case Against Miscegenation’

https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/03/06/fornication-adultery-and-idolatry-a-biblical-case-against-miscegenation/

‘The Origins of the Non-Adamic Races’

https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/02/02/the-origins-of-the-non-adamic-races/

This narrative is shrouded in idioms long lost to time and the death of ancient Mesopotamian culture, but we must also understand that the details of these events had not been fully illuminated until the days of Christ:

“34 All these things spake Jesus unto the multitude in parables; and without a parable spake he not unto them:

35 That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet, saying, I will open my mouth in parables; I will utter things which have been kept secret from the foundation of the world.”
-Matthew 13

“The foundation of the world” is a reference to the opening chapters of Genesis and the creation when the foundations of the earth were laid. Now let’s see what Jesus revealed to us. “He who has ears to hear, let him hear”:

“24 Another parable put he forth unto them, saying, The kingdom of heaven is likened unto a man which sowed good seed in his field:

25 But while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat, and went his way.

26 But when the blade was sprung up, and brought forth fruit, then appeared the tares also.

27 So the servants of the householder came and said unto him, Sir, didst not thou sow good seed in thy field? from whence then hath it tares?

28 He said unto them, An enemy hath done this. The servants said unto him, Wilt thou then that we go and gather them up?

29 But he said, Nay; lest while ye gather up the tares, ye root up also the wheat with them.

30 Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn.”
-Matthew 13

As I hope to have established in prerequisite writings, plant life often symbolizes family trees, races and nations. There are dozens of passages in Scripture which use this idiom, but here Christ explains the idiom to us himself:

“36 Then Jesus sent the multitude away, and went into the house: and his disciples came unto him, saying, Declare unto us the parable of the tares of the field.

37 He answered and said unto them, He that soweth the good seed [sperma, G4690] is the Son of man;

38 The field is the world; the good seed [sperma, G4690] are the children [huioi, Strong’s G5207, meaning a son or descendant] of the kingdom; but the tares are the children [huioi G5207] of the wicked one;

39 The enemy that sowed them is the devil; the harvest is the end of the world; and the reapers are the angels.

40 As therefore the tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world.

41 The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity;

42 And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.

43 Then shall the righteous shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.”
-Matthew 13

Here Christ explains to us in no uncertain terms that there are souls planted in this world who have their origin not with God, but Satan. His words recall to mind Malachi 4.2

“1For, behold, a day comes burning as an oven, and it shall consume them; and all the aliens [allogeneis, Strong’s G241, meaning literally “of another race”], and all that do wickedly, shall be stubble: and the day that is coming shall set them on fire, saith the Lord Almighty, and there shall not be left of them root or branch. 2But to you that fear my name shall the Sun of righteousness arise, and healing shall be in his wings: and ye shall go forth, and bound as young calves let loose from bonds. 3And ye shall trample the wicked; for they shall be ashes underneath your feet in the day which I appoint, saith the Lord Almighty.”
-Malachi 4

In the New Testament there is a great deal of evidence for what I endeavour to demonstrate but for now we will focus on Matthew. 

In the second chapter of Matthew we find that King Herod is greatly troubled by the birth of Christ and seeks to kill him slaughtering many baby boys in the process. 

King Herod and the entire Herodian dynasty were Edomites by race, and this is affirmed many times in the writings of Flavius Josephus (Antiquities 14.3, 12.8 et al.). 

These Edomites had risen to the peaks of power in Judaea through murder of the Hasmonean dynasty and by bribing Mark Antony. This demonic madman, Herod “the Great”, is spoken of in the Revelation of Jesus Christ, and there we find him fittingly playing the role allotted to the dragon, who represents the entire serpent race:

“1 And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman [Israel] clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars [the tribes]:

2 And she being with child [the Christ] cried, travailing in birth, and pained to be delivered.

3 And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon [the serpent seed], having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads.

4 And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven [the rebellious Angels], and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child [Christ] as soon as it was born.

5 And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne.”
-Revelation 12

Continuing with our investigation of the serpent race in the Gospel of Matthew we arrive at the 3rd chapter and the introduction of John the Baptist. John is baptizing people in the river and the Judaean religious authorities (mostly appointed by the Herodians) approach him to inquire of him concerning his ministry:

“7 But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees come to his baptism, he said unto them, O offspring [Strong’s G1081] of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?

8 Bring forth therefore fruits meet for repentance:

9 And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father [the Edomites descended paternally from Abraham]: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.

10 And now also the axe is laid unto the root of the trees: therefore every tree which bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.

11 I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance. but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost, and with fire:

12 Whose fan is in his hand, and he will throughly purge his floor, and gather his wheat into the garner; but he will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire.”
-Matthew 3

Right away John rebukes these men calling them a race of vipers. This is of course a reference to the serpent seed. See that he tells them not to pride themselves in their descent from Abraham. 

The Edomites descended from Abraham’s race-mixing grandson Esau, and on their maternal side they descended from a conglomeration of non-Adamic tribes which the Edomites had been joined to since their first generation. Esau-Edom had fallen from a high place as the firstborn of Isaac to a lowly place as the most despised nation of Scripture because of his fornication. 

John said to his opponents “even now the axe is laid to the root of the tree”. Jesus had come to the land and was about to begin his ministry. His ministry would divide the people of Judaea and thus the judgement of the trees was underway. 

The Edomites were of a vile spirit after their profane, idolatrous fornicating ancestors and so they would naturally be opposed to the gospel of Christ, but they had other reasons for despising Christ’s ministry.

The Edomites had only recently solidified their power in Judaea but were well on their way to complete racial and political domination of Judaea. Esau has long coveted Jacob’s covenant with God, and has constantly sought to do harm to Israel.

A religious reformation in Judaea threatened their newly found dominance of Judaeanism and all they had murdered and bribed to achieve. Thus these infiltrators were zealous enemies of Christ and his followers by necessity.

Verse 12 is a clear reference to the harvest as described by Christ in the parable of the wheat and the tares and a reminder to the serpent seed that its days are numbered.

Carrying on with Matthew we arrive in chapter 7 where Christ makes yet another reference to the hewing down and burning of evil plants (races) while also offering us helpful advice for distinguishing wheat and tares:

“15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.

16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?

17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.

18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.

19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.

20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.”
-Matthew 7

Tares (lolium temulentum) look very much like wheat. It is for this reason that the master of the field (God) tells his servants to wait until the harvest is ripe to root up the tares, lest they uproot wheat along with them.

Edomite-Canaanite Jews are generally united by certain Armenoid or Arabid racial traits, but they are generally predominantly Europoid in phenotype. They often fit in well in Europe with Sephardim often passing as Southern or Western European and Ashkenazim as Northern or Eastern European. 

Edomite Jews can often blend in very well racially among Israelite Christians, and these “ravenous wolves” use this to enter our fold. Christ assures us that their deeds will expose them to the watchful Christian who knows them by their fruits.

In Matthew chapter 12 we find similar statements. This time in the context of the blasphemy of the Pharisees:

“33 Either make the tree good, and his fruit good; or else make the tree corrupt, and his fruit corrupt: for the tree is known by his fruit.

34 Offspring [gennemata, Strong’s G1081] of vipers, how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.

35 A good man out of the good treasure of the heart bringeth forth good things: and an evil man out of the evil treasure bringeth forth evil things.”
-Matthew 12

Now we have arrived back at chapter 13 where I introduced the topic with the parable of the wheat and the tares. Here we find another parable echoing the same theme as that of the parable of the wheat and the tares:

“47 Again, the kingdom of heaven is like unto a net, that was cast into the sea, and gathered of every kind [genos, Strong’s G1053, meaning race]:

48 Which, when it was full, they drew to shore, and sat down, and gathered the good into vessels, but cast the bad away.

49 So shall it be at the end of the world: the angels shall come forth, and sever the wicked from among the just,

50 And shall cast them into the furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.”
-Matthew 13

By now the implications of this verse should be clear and require no further explanation. Recall now when Christ told certain of his disciples they would be fishers of men (Matthew 4.19).

There is one reference to the serpent seed found in Matthew chapter 15. It is brief, but provides another witness that God did not plant every race on this earth. After his disciples inform Jesus that he has offended the Pharisees with his teachings we read:

“13 But he answered and said, Every plant, which my heavenly Father hath not planted, shall be rooted up.”
-Matthew 15

Here in Matthew 21 Christ performs a miracle which indicates the fulfillment and sealing of prophecy:

“18 Now in the morning as he returned into the city, he hungered.

19 And when he saw a fig tree in the way, he came to it, and found nothing thereon, but leaves only, and said unto it, Let no fruit grow on thee henceforward for ever. And presently the fig tree withered away.”
-Matthew 21

Jeremiah prophecied of the corruption of the stock of Judaea in chapter 24. Here the prophet refers to the Edomites and halfbreeds of Judaea as “bad figs” and the Israelites of Judaea as “good figs”. 

“1The Lord shewed me two baskets of figs, lying in front of the temple of the Lord, after Nabuchodonosor king of Babylon had carried captive Jechonias son of Joakim king of Juda, and the princes, and the artificers, and the prisoners, and the rich men out of Jerusalem, and had brought them to Babylon. 2The one basket was full of very good figs, as the early figs; and the other basket was full of very bad figs, which could not be eaten, for their badness. 3And the Lord said to me, What seest thou, Jeremias? and I said, Figs; the good figs, very good; and the bad, very bad, which cannot be eaten, for their badness.

4And the word of the Lord came to me, saying, 5Thus saith the Lord, the God of Israel; As these good figs, so will I acknowledge the Judeans that have been carried away captive, whom I have sent forth out of this place into the land of the Chaldeans for good. 6And I will fix mine eyes upon them for good, and I will restore them into this land for good: and I will build them up, and not pull them down; and I will plant them, and not pluck them up. 7And I will give them a heart to know me, that I am the Lord: and they shall be to me a people, and I will be to them a God: for they shall turn to me with all their heart.

8And as the bad figs, which cannot be eaten, for their badness; thus saith the Lord, So will I deliver Sedekias king of Juda, and his nobles, and the remnant of Jerusalem, them that are left in this land, and the dwellers in Egypt. 9And I will cause them to be dispersed into all the kingdoms of the earth, and they shall be for a reproach, and a proverb, and an object of hatred, and a curse, in every place whither I have driven them out.”
-Jeremiah 24

The prophet Jeremiah speaks here of “the remnant of Jerusalem, them that are left in this land, and the dwellers in Egypt.” These are Judaeans who evaded the Babylonian captivity and remained in Judaea and neighbouring regions. 

They came to be overwhelmed by the Edomites, Canaanites and others who moved into the lands of Israel and Judah after they were deported by the Assyrians and Babylonians. 

The result was a nation partially comprised of paganized and racially impure Judaeans. These events predate even the Edomite conversion to Judaism in 125 BC. The fornication and heresy of Judah was known well to the prophet:

“20For of old thou hast broken thy yoke, and plucked asunder thy bands; and thou has said, I will not serve thee, but will go upon every high hill, and under every shady tree, there will I indulge in my fornication.

21Yet I planted thee a fruitful vine, entirely of the right sort: how art thou a strange vine turned to bitterness!

22Though thou shouldest wash thyself with nitre, and multiply to thyself soap, still thou art stained by thine iniquities before me, saith the Lord.”
-Jeremiah 2

These” bad figs” of Judah and the vision of Jeremiah are alluded to again in the New Testament when Christ twice cursed the fig tree upon finding the temple turned into a “den of theives” (Matthew 21:18–22, Mark 11:12–14, 11:20–25). 

Next we come to chapter 23 and a lengthly rebuke by Christ to the scribes and Pharisees:

“29 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous,

30 And say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets.

31 Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets.

32 Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers.

33 Ye serpents, ye offspring [G1081] of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?

34 Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes: and some of them ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute them from city to city:

35 That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.

36 Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this race (genean, G1074).”
-Matthew 23

The Scriptures do not inform us of how the prophets each died, but on occasions when the priests of God are murdered we see characters such as Jezebel the Canaanitess or Doeg the Edomite responsible.

Christ holds their race responsible for all the righteous blood shed upon the earth from Abel unto Zacharias, the father of John the Baptist. This links one race from Cain in Eden to the 1st century Judaeans. 

Christ was speaking to the scribes and Pharisees. The Pharisees were a mix of Israelites and Edomites like the rest of the 1st century Judaeans, but the scribes may have had among them Kenites, as some Kenites (sons of Cain) had been employed as scribes by the Judahites even before the Edomites began to be absorbed into Judaea (1Chronicles 2.55).

Even in more ancient times the Israelite tribes of Judah, Benjamin and Levi that would form the Kingdom of Judah had struggled with miscegenation and cohabitation with the Kenites and Canaanites. In Genesis 38.1-5 we read that Judah married Shuah, A Canaanitess who bore him three mongrel sons, Er, Onan and Shelah. While Er and Onan were both slain by God, Shelah lived and his descendants remained among Judah as we see in Numbers 26.20.

Only thanks to the wit of Tamar did Judah have Adamic posterity and we see that the sons of Tamar were counted as the first and second born of Judah. This is despite the fact that Shelah was their elder brother, proving the illegitimate status of the Canaanite mongrel. In Judges 1.16-21 we find that Moses erred in marrying a Kenite woman and that the Kenites dwelt in the South of the land of Judah. There we also see that the Canaanite tribe of the Jebusites settled among the tribe of Benjamin in Jerusalem and we find in Joshua 15.63 that these Jebusites remained there until the time of Moses.

It is now necessary to make a small digression concerning the relatives of Moses. There is some confusion among Biblical scholars concerning certain names found in the Old Testament applied to Moses’ relatives. In the book of Exodus we read of Moses’ father in law, the priest of Midian (Exodus 2.16-18), and a Midianite by race (Numbers 10.29). In their strict adherence to the Masoretic Text of the Jews many scholars have errantly associated Jethro the Midianite with another figure; Moses’ Kenite father in law. This has led to many confused attempts to explain how Jethro could be both a Midianite and a Kenite. They also try to assign three different names found in the Masoretic Text to the single figure of Jethro which seems quite implausible. 

In truth Jethro was only known by one other name; Raguel. This is evident in Exodus 2.16-18 in the Septuagint where he is refered to by both names in the same passage and Numbers 10.29 where Raguel is called the father in law of Moses and a Midianite. In Numbers 10.29 in the Masoretic Text and the Vulgate Jethro/Raguel is named as the father of Hobab. At Judges 4.11 in the Masoretic Text Hobab is refered to as a Kenite and the father in law of Moses. One might conclude based on this that Jethro was also a Kenite and known by a third name, Hobab, but this is in conflict with the fact that Jethro is elsewhere refered to as a Midianite. The reconciliation is to be found in the Septuagint where Judges 4.11 has Jobab and not Hobab, thus we may conclude that the Hobab descended from Jethro/Raguel was a Midianite and unrelated to this Jobab the Kenite whose daughter Moses errantly wed. 

The Kenites had become absorbed into the Canaanite nations at an early time, and Esau-Edom had become absorbed partially into the Canaanites, thus all three tribal groups carried some of Cain’s DNA. It is also likely that many of the Judaean elders were Canaanites themselves (Zechariah 14.21, Susanna 1.56) and so it’s possible all three cursed lineages had direct descendants in the 1st century Judaean populace, particularly among scribes and Pharisees. Thus Christ rightly accuses their brood of shedding the blood of Abel and Zacharias, and of all the righteous priests of God.

We now come near to the end of Christ’s conflict with the serpent seed during his earthly ministry. Of course Jesus was betrayed for 30 pieces of silver by Judah of Kerioth aka Judas Iscariot.

Judas was certainly an Edomite. Kerioth was 10 miles south of Hebron in what was called Idumea (Edom) in the time of Christ due to Edomite settlement.

Christ said that one of the twelve was a devil (John 6.70) and of course this was Judas who ultimately betrayed him to the Judaean authorities:

“15 Now at that feast the governor was wont to release unto the people a prisoner, whom they would.

16 And they had then a notable prisoner, called Barabbas.

17 Therefore when they were gathered together, Pilate said unto them, Whom will ye that I release unto you? Barabbas, or Jesus which is called Christ?

18 For he knew that for envy they had delivered him.

19 When he was set down on the judgment seat, his wife sent unto him, saying, Have thou nothing to do with that just man: for I have suffered many things this day in a dream because of him.

20 But the chief priests and elders persuaded the multitude that they should ask Barabbas, and destroy Jesus.

21 The governor answered and said unto them, Whether of the twain will ye that I release unto you? They said, Barabbas.

22 Pilate saith unto them, What shall I do then with Jesus which is called Christ? They all say unto him, Let him be crucified.

23 And the governor said, Why, what evil hath he done? But they cried out the more, saying, Let him be crucified.

24 When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but that rather a tumult was made, he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, I am innocent of the blood of this just person: see ye to it.

25 Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children.

26 Then released he Barabbas unto them: and when he had scourged Jesus, he delivered him to be crucified.”
-Matthew 27

Pilate obviously objected to the killing of Christ and had found him innocent. He washed his hands of the matter and the Judaean masses declared “his blood be on us and our descendants”. 

The Edomite Jews typically try to blame the Romans for the death of Jesus, but Jesus may forgive the Romans and his children among the Judaeans who participated in his torment and death. The children of Satan who they abided with have no hope of redemption.

The Tree of Life: Redemption of the Adamic Race

In past articles I have written with the purpose of identifying the descendants of ancient Israel in the modern world and showing the nature of their unique relationship with God.

While these Israelites formed many of the great nations in European history and are the sole heirs of the New Covenant, other Adamic nations likewise have survived to this day and these also are recipients of blessings and promises from God. Here I will not discuss the identification of these Adamic tribes as better scholars have already expounded upon that at great length.

https://christogenea.org/essays/race-genesis-10

My purpose here will be to explain the relationship between God and the Adamic race, of which Israel was originally but a small part (Deuteronomy 7.7) as well as the relationship between Israel and the other Adamic nations.

When sin entered into the world through the seduction of Eve by the serpent the whole of the Adamic race was affected. From that time onward we existed in a world of sin and were in need of redemption. 

‘The Origins of the Serpent Seed’
https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-origins-of-the-serpent-seed/

The tree of life represents the Christ. He is the vine and his children are the branches (John 15.5). He is the head of the assembly and we the body. This is shown in Revelation 2.7 and 22.2 where the tree of life life represents salvation in Christ. We find in the third chapter of Genesis the first prophecy of Christ in Scripture:

“22And God said, Behold, Adam is become as one of us, to know good and evil, and now lest at any time he stretch forth his hand, and take of the tree of life and eat, and so he shall live forever—23So the Lord God sent him forth out of the garden of Delight to cultivate the ground out of which he was taken. 24And he cast out Adam and caused him to dwell over against the garden of Delight, and stationed the cherubs and the fiery sword that turns about to keep the way of the tree of life.”
-Genesis 3

Adam was cast from the garden of Eden and from this point forward in the Old Testament the Adamic race awaited redemption in Christ. St. Paul explains this to us in chapter 15 of 1 Corinthians:

“21 For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead.

22 For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.

23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.”
-1 Corinthians 15

In Genesis chapter 6 God establishes the Noahitic covenant and promises never to cleanse the world with water again. He bids the Adamites to go forth and spread throughout the earth. Eventually these tribes would spread across Eurasia and North-Eastern Africa forming all the prominent nations of the ancient world. This Adamic world is described as “the garden of God” in Ezekiel 31.8 implying that God tends to the whole Adamic race as a gardener.

The inhabited earth (oikoumenes, Luke 2.1) according to Herodotus (the garden of God, Ezekiel 31.8)

In the Old Testament there are many instances where God commands repentance and obedience from the other Adamites and shows that He desires their prayer and worship. In Isaiah 19 God speaks of the repentance of the Hamitic Egyptians (Mizraim) from idolatry. In Verses 19-22 of that chapter God says He will be worshiped by the Egyptians and that He will deliver and heal them.

In 1 Kings 8 Solomon dedicates the temple he has built. It is evident here that the temple existed as a place of prayer and worship for the other Adamic nations as well as Israel. 

“41And for the stranger who is not of thy people, 42when they shall come and pray toward this place, 43then shalt thou hear them from heaven, out of thine established dwelling-place, and thou shalt do according to all that the stranger shall call upon thee for, that all the nations may know thy name, and fear thee, as do thy people Israel, and may know that thy name has been called on this house which I have builded.”
-1 Kings 8

In Jonah 3 the men of Ninevah (Assyrians, the Semitic Ashur) repented after Jonah preached to them showing that God is concerned with the moral state of the other Adamites. In Isaiah 60.6-16 we see God’s intent to establish his worship among many nations aside from Israel.

In the twelfth chapter of Matthew we see that both the Assyrians and Sabeans would see the resurrection and so we see another witness to the resurrection of the entire race of Adam.

“40 For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale’s belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.

41 The men of Nineveh shall rise in judgment with this generation, and shall condemn it: because they repented at the preaching of Jonas; and, behold, a greater than Jonas is here.

42 The queen of the south shall rise up in the judgment with this generation, and shall condemn it: for she came from the uttermost parts of the earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon; and, behold, greater than Solomon is here.”
-Matthew 12

In Amos chapter 9 the Exodus of Israel is mentioned alongside other Adamic migrations apparently led by God. We see that God watched over the Hamitic Ethiopians (Cush) and Philistines (Casluhim) as well as the Semitic Syrians (Aram). 

“7Are not ye to me as the sons of the Ethiopians, O children of Israel? saith the Lord. Did I not bring Israel up out of the land of Egypt, and the Philistines from Cappadocia, and the Syrians out of the deep?”
-Amos 9

‘Concerning the Ancient Aethiops’ 
https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/01/28/concerning-the-ancient-aethiops

In Isaiah 45.1-13 God calls the Persian King Cyrus his anointed and states that Cyrus will rule with his blessing and be instrumental in gathering Israel and rebuilding his temple. Of course this was fulfilled when King Cyrus liberated the Judahites of the Babylonian captivity, aided them by providing a large sum of money for building supplies and facilitated the return of the sacred vessels seized by the Babylonians.

There are several Adamic preists to God outside of Israel in Scripture. The most notable is Melchizedek who blessed Abraham (Genesis 14.18-20). It is actually the priestly order established by Melchizedek to which Jesus Christ belongs as we see in several places in chapters 5-7 of Paul’s epistle to the Hebrews.

Another Adamic preist to the God of Jacob in Scripture is Jethro the priest of Midian (Exodus 2.16, 18) whose daughter Zipporah was taken to wife by Moses. Balaam too spoke to God (Numbers 22.8-12, 23, 24) though he led Israel to sin in fornicating with the alien daughters of Moab and is surely not an example of good works.

‘Fornication, Adultery and Idolatry: a Biblical Case Against Miscegenation’
https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/03/06/fornication-adultery-and-idolatry-a-biblical-case-against-miscegenation/

The King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon was humbled by the miracles God performed for Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego. He blessed their God, publicly acknowledged Him as the most mighty God and issued a decree protecting the worshipers of God (Daniel 3.28-29, 4.1-3).

King Darius the Mede (descended from Madai son of Japheth) also came to worship God after witnessing the miracle of Daniel in the lion’s den (Daniel 6.25-27). In 1 Kings 10.1-9 the Queen of Seba is impressed by Solomon and his God and blesses the God of Jacob.

In Exodus 2 Moses is wed to the Semitic Midianite Zipporah and in Judges 14 Samson was wed to a Hamitic Philistine woman from Timnah. In Genesis 41 we find that Joseph married Asenath the Egyptian who may have been either a Semite or a Hamite. 

These unions were permitted by God even when the kin of Moses and Samson were opposed to them. So we see that Israelite men may bear legitimate Israelite offspring by non-Israelite women of Adamic pedigree while only marriages with cursed nations such as the Canaanite tribes were forbidden.

In Genesis 9.27 Noah prophecies that Japheth will be multiplied and dwell in the tents of his brother Shem. This has seen many fulfillments in history. The Semitic Persians (Elam) dwelt alongside the Japhetic Medes (Madai). The Scythian Israelites dwelt with the Medes too as well as among the Japhetic Thracians (Thiras), Moschi (Meshech) and Tibareni (Tubal). The Phoenician Israelites settled among the Japhetic Tartessians (Tarshish) and the Dorian and Danaan Israelites settled among the Japhetic Ionians (Javan).

In light of the oracle at Genesis 9.27 and the identification of these tribes in later history it seems probable that Japheth is the most fruitful branch of the Adamic race apart from Israel. Today we see the Slavic Japhethites mingled among and neighbouring with the descendants of the Scythian Israelites in Central and Eastern Europe. 

Many of the Judeans along with the Greeks, Celts, Romans and Scythians who recieved the Gospel were Israelites, a topic beyond the scope of this discussion. 

‘Scythian Origins: the Lost Tribes in Iran, the Steppe and Europe’
https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/02/13/scythian-origins-the-lost-tribes-in-iran-the-steppe-and-europe-2/ 

‘The Israelite Origins of Europa: the Phoenicians in the West’
https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-israelite-origins-of-europa-the-phoenicians-in-the-west/ 

‘Dardan, Danaan and Dorian Origins: the Mediterranean Migrations of Ancient Israel’
https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/02/13/dardan-danaan-and-dorian-origins-the-mediterranean-migrations-of-israel-2/ 

There are however several times in Scripture where Christ and his apostles spoke about or to Adamites not of Israel. In one instance in 1 Peter chapter 3 we see that Christ preached to the spirits of deceased antedeluvian Adamites. 

“18 For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit:

19 By which also he went and preached unto the spirits in prison;

20 Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.”
-1 Peter 3

St. Paul once addressed a group of Athenian philosophers. The Athenians were of Ionian stock and thus primarily descended from the Japhetic patriarch Javan. 

“22 Then Paul stood in the midst of Mars’ hill, and said, Ye men of Athens, I perceive that in all things ye are too superstitious.

23 For as I passed by, and beheld your devotions, I found an altar with this inscription, To The Unknown God. Whom therefore ye ignorantly worship, him declare I unto you.

24 God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands;

25 Neither is worshipped with men’s hands, as though he needed any thing, seeing he giveth to all life, and breath, and all things;

26 And hath made of one all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;”
-Acts 17

Notice that St. Paul speaks of the common source of their life and breath and their distant common descent from Adam, the “one” of verse 26. 

“27 That they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him, and find him, though he be not far from every one of us:

28 For in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also of your own poets have said, For we are also his offspring.”

Here St. Paul quotes the philosopher Aratus, a clever use of profane writings admired among philosophers to communicate their distant common descent. 

“29 Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man’s device.

30 And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but now commandeth all men every where to repent:

31 Because he hath appointed a day, in the which he will judge the world in righteousness by that man whom he hath ordained; whereof he hath given assurance unto all men, in that he hath raised him from the dead.

32 And when they heard of the resurrection of the dead, some mocked: and others said, We will hear thee again of this matter.

33 So Paul departed from among them.

34 Howbeit certain men clave unto him, and believed: among the which was Dionysius the Areopagite, and a woman named Damaris, and others with them.”
-Acts 17

St. Paul calls the Athenians offspring of God, another reference to Adamic lineage. He then proclaims the resurrection in which the Athenians will one day share and apparently a few of the Athenians embraced St. Paul’s message. Here in Athens St. Paul said nothing about the law, the fathers or the covenants nor does he quote the prophets. He only speaks of their common origin in Adam and life in Christ.

In the final chapter of Revelation the tree of life is described. Of course the twelve fruits of the tree represent the twelve tribes of Israel who are branches grafted into the tree of life through redemption in Christ. 

“1 And he shewed me a pure river of water of life, clear as crystal, proceeding out of the throne of God and of the Lamb.

2 In the midst of the street of it, and on either side of the river, was there the tree of life, which bare twelve manner of fruits, and yielded her fruit every month: and the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations”
-Revelation 22

In many instances in Scripture “the nations” or “the Gentiles” refers to those many nations of Israel promised to Abraham, but here the leaves representing nations are distinct from the tree and the tree and the leaves from the nations. So we see these nations must be those Adamic nations apart from Israel and thus we are reminded that the whole race of Adam will be found in the Kingdom.

Under the Old Covenant non-Israelites of Adamic stock were permitted to live among Israel and were expected to keep the laws given to Israel. In Exodus chapter twelve we are given instruction for the treatment of those Adamites who dwell among Israel.

“43And the Lord said to Moses and Aaron, This is the law of the passover: no stranger (allogenes, G241 meaning literally “of another race” i.e. a non-Adamite) shall eat of it. 44And every slave or servant bought with money—him thou shalt circumcise, and then shall he eat of it. 45A sojourner or hireling shall not eat of it. 46In one house shall it be eaten, and ye shall not carry of the flesh out from the house; and a bone of it ye shall not break. 47All the congregation of the children of Israel shall keep it. 48And if any proselyte shall come to you to keep the passover to the Lord, thou shalt circumcise every male of him, and then shall he approach to sacrifice it, and he shall be even as the original inhabitant of the land; no uncircumcised person shall eat of it. 49There shall be one law to the native, and to the proselyte coming among you.”
-Exodus 12

We also find other Scriptures which remind us of the proselyte’s obligation to the law (Leviticus 24.22, Numbers 9.14, 15.15-16). These ordinances set the precedent for later Christian assemblies. The Israelite nations with whom the New Covenant was made co-existed with the remnants of the various Adamic nations who had preceded them into Europe, the Mediterranean Basin and Asia Minor. Under this provision of the law these other Adamites dwell among us as Christians, circumcised in their hearts, keeping the statutes of Israel and sharing in the passover.

In the book of Isaiah we are told the purpose of Israel’s covenant relationship with God and that is for Israel to be a light to the other Adamic nations and to show his glory. 

“5Thus saith the Lord God, who made the heaven, and established it; who settled the earth, and the things in it, and gives breath to the people on it, and spirit to them that tread on it:

6I the Lord God have called thee in righteousness, and will hold thine hand, and will strengthen thee: and I have given thee for the covenant of a race, for a light of the nations:

7to open the eyes of the blind, to bring the bound and them that sit in darkness out of bonds and the prison-house.

8I am the Lord God: that is my name: I will not give my glory to another, nor my praises to graven images.

9Behold, the ancient things have come to pass, and so will the new things which I tell you: yea, before I tell them they are made known to you.

10Sing a new hymn to the Lord: ye who are his dominion, glorify his name from the end of the earth: ye that go down to the sea, and sail upon it; the islands, and they that dwell in them.

11Rejoice, thou wilderness, and the villages thereof, the hamlets, and the dwellers in Kedar: the inhabitants of the rock shall rejoice, they shall shout from the top of the mountains.

12They shall give glory to God, and shall proclaim his praises in the islands.”
-Isaiah 42

This theme is reiterated in the beginning portion of Isaiah 49. This reminds us of the Abrahamic Covenant and the promise that in Abraham’s seed all the nations would be blessed (Genesis 22.18). It is of course the unconditional Abrahamic Covenant which is the foundation of the New Covenant as Israel repeatedly breached every condition of the covenant made at Sinai. 

We can glean from these passages some important information regarding the nature of Israel’s covenant and their relationship to the other Adamites. Firstly we see that Israel is given the covenant of a race and this affirms that the covenant belongs to Israel alone with whom the covenant was established. We also see that the Israelite race will be a light to the other nations who are here distinguished from the race of Israel. Thus these can only be the the other Adamic nations who through Israel will come to know God’s glory. 

The other Adamites do not share in the New Covenant as they had no need of redemption from the broken Old Covenant and failure under the law. These Adamic nations need only the sacrifice of Christ to reattain the former position of Adam and Eve once sinless and immortal. Israel is uniquely blessed and elected by God to minister to and heal these nations in the Kingdom.

‘The New Covenant with Israel’
https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-new-covenant-with-israel/

“1Thus saith the Lord, Keep ye judgment, and do justice: for my salvation is near to come, and my mercy to be revealed.

2Blessed is the man that does these things, and the man that holds by them, and keeps the sabbaths from profaning them, and keeps his hands from doing unrighteousness.

3Let not the stranger who attaches himself to the Lord, say, Surely the Lord will separate me from his people: and let not the eunuch say, I am a dry tree.

4Thus saith the Lord to the eunuchs, as many as shall keep my sabbaths, and choose the things which I take pleasure in, and take hold of my covenant;

5I will give to them in my house and within my walls an honourable place, better than sons and daughters: I will give them an everlasting name, and it shall not fail.

6And I will give it to the strangers that attach themselves to the Lord, to serve him, and to love the name of the Lord, to be to him servants and handmaids; and as for all that keep my sabbaths from profaning them, and that take hold of my covenant;

7I will bring them to my holy mountain, and gladden them in my house of prayer: their whole-burnt-offerings and their sacrifices shall be acceptable upon mine altar; for my house shall be called a house of prayer for all nations,

8saith the Lord that gathers the dispersed of Israel; for I will gather to him a congregation.”
-Isaiah 56

The Linguistic Developments of the Shemites, Hebrews and Israelites

‘The Tower of Babel’ -Pieter Bruegel The Elder

I am often asked how it is that the Israelites ceased to speak Afro-Asiatic languages and came to speak Indo-European languages. Language and ancestry are two different matters. It is very clear from genetic data from modern and ancient Indo-European speakers that the Indo-European languages were propagated to many relatively diverse ethnic groups who had various different tongues of their own before.

These people of course all generally belonged to the Adamic race, but within that spectrum there was considerable diversity that cannot all be attributed to a singular proto-Indo-European speaking population. Thus the constant search by scholars of Indo-European studies for the theoretical Proto-Indo-European “Urheimat” could never tell us where all modern Indo-European speakers originate.

It is now pertinent to discuss some common misconceptions about language in relation to the Adamic nations of Scripture. It is commonly perceived that that Indo-European is synonymous with Japhetic and that Afro-Asiatic encompasses the Hamites and Shemites. However this is demonstrably false. There are several biblical nations clearly identifiable in history and archaeology as Indo-European speakers; Medes (Madai), Thracians (Thiras), Ionians (Javan) and Lydians (Lud). While three of these four nations are indeed Japhetic, Lydians were Shemitic according to Biblical genealogy. Not only was one of these Indo-European speaking nations Shemitic rather than Japhetic, but there were also Japhetic tribes who spoke non Indo-European languages such as Basque and the Kartvelian language family. So we see that there is no real consistency in this theory that Japhetic and Indo-European are synonymous.

The Biblical Philistines seem to have been speakers of an Indo-European proto-Greek dialect. Many scholars identify them with the Minoans of Crete (wrongly connected with and named for the Minos of Greek legend) which is commonly thought to be the Biblical Caphtor, the original home of the Philistines. It is unclear whether they were non-Indo-European speakers Hellenized by Ionian contact or whether they were proto-Greek speakers all along, but in either case it is evident these Hamitic Philistines in some way defy the narrative that all the Biblical Hamites are Afro-Asiatic speakers. (See Bryant G. Wood’s ‘The Genesis Philistines’ from the Associates for Biblical Research).

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/ancient-dna-sheds-new-light-biblical-philistines-180972561/

We also find that there were non Indo-European speaking Adamic nations who came to adopt Indo-European speech at an early time. Many scholars identify the Biblical Hamitic Hittites with the Indo-European speaking people of Hatti, commonly refered to now by the Biblical name Hittite, however I believe this identification is somewhat errant. Rather I believe the original Hittites of Genesis 10 were the earlier inhabitants called the Hattians as it seems highly unlikely to me that a people with such a similar name could have preceded the sons of Heth into that land. These Hattians were speakers of the isolate language known as Hattic who were later overcome by Indo-European speakers who established what is commonly called Hittite civilization today. These latter arrivals seem to have retained the name of the land of Hatti in which their empire was established. In the wake of this conquest the Hattians came to speak an Anatolian Indo-European language and gradually abandoned Hattic speech as they were absorbed into the populace of the new empire.

A similar occurrence happened in Iran where the Elamites (Biblical Elam) were Indo-Europeanized through extensive contact with Iranic speaking tribes such as the Medes. The isolate language Elamite continued to be used as a courtly language in the Persian Achmaenid empire showing that some Elamites must’ve remained a considerable element in the Persian aristocracy. Throughout history Persia is consistently the party fulfilling prophecies regarding Elam and Josephus identifies Elam as the patriarch of the Persians (Antiquities 1.6.4) so presumably the Elamites formed an Indo-Europeanized element of the Persian aristocracy. Undoubtedly it was these Elamites who contributed to the obvious Mesopotamian influences exhibited in Persian art and culture. All of this goes to show that the narrative of Indo-Europeans as Japhethites and Afro-Asiatics as Hamites and Shemites is deeply flawed.

https://christogenea.org/essays/race-genesis-10

There is ample evidence for the linguistic transition of the Israelites out of the Afro-Asiatic speaking world and into the Indo-European world bringing considerable Semitic influence with them. This was the result of a series of contacts between the Israelites and their ancestors with Indo-European speakers during nomadic or semi-nomadic phases in their history. First their ancestors were at the tower of Babel when the Heavenly Host confounded the speech of the Adamites.

Biblical scholars have long generally agreed that the Shinar or Senaar of Genesis 11 where the Noahites all gathered after the flood is the Sumer of ancient Mesopotamia. This is supported by the similarity in the two Semitic names (Sumer is an Akkadian word), the matching geographical descriptions and the association with Babel, Akkad and Uruk. In Genesis 11 the Noahites all gathered in Sumer/Shinar and there they shared in the same speech and custom.

The Sumerian language is known today as a linguistic isolate, but was once thought to be the origin of the Indo-European languages. A comparison between Sumerian and Indo-European was made by Charles Autran already in 1925, finding many similar roots and even suffixes, like -ta for the origin (Skt. -tas), -bi for the instrumental (Skt. -bhis). Gordon Whittaker, since 1998, has identified so-called Euphratic, a substratum or superstratum in Sumerian, with an Indo-European language.

Particularly interesting is his analysis of the phonetic values, without meaning in Sumerian, of pictographic symbols, which in some cases can suggest an IE connection. The symbol for a fish is read peš, which recalls PIE *pisk/peisk- ‘fish’, perhaps from the Indo-European root pi- ‘to drink’ and the frequentative suffix -sk-. The symbol of a bird is read hu, and can be compared with PIE *hwi/hwai- ‘bird’ (notably Armenian hav meaning ‘chicken’). The logogram for ‘dog’, with an animal head, is read lik, and recalls PIE *wlkwa- ‘wolf’, especially Greek lykos.

The logogram for ‘fox’, with the symbol of a fox’s head with large ears, is read lib/lub, comparable to the PIE *wlpe- ‘fox’ (Latin vulpes, Greek alopex), which is apparently an offshoot or variant of the previous one (with kw > p). The phonetic values for ‘prince’ are nar/nara, as in the Sanskrit term for ‘man, hero’ (ner/nir).

In a publication of 2012, Whittaker has suggested laws of phonetic change from Euphratic to Sumerian, which is a necessary aspect in a scientific demonstration of the existence of this Indo-European language. In support he cites other examples of phonetic values, like sah/suh for the sign ‘thread+thread’, recalling Skt. sū-tra-‘thread’, from the root s(y)ū- ‘to sew’, corresponding to Latin su-ere. Also of note is semed for the sign ‘one’, comparable to the PIE root *sam-, found e.g. in English same and Latin semel ‘once’.

Aleksi Sahala, Assyriologist of the University of Helsinki, has between 2009 and 2013 proposed 30 Sumerian words with a possible common etymology with Indo-European. In 1927, the British explorer and scholar of Sanskrit, Laurence Waddell published a book with the title Aryan Origin of the Alphabet and Sumer-Aryan Dictionary.

Sumerian civilization was generally bilingual with the general populace being fluent in both Sumerian and Akkadian, the earliest attested Semitic language. Of course both languages used the same Sumero-Akkadian cuneiform. Linguists regard the relationship between Sumerian and Akkadian as a “sprachbund”; a group of closely related languages with profound influence on one another from lexical borrowing on a large scale, to syntactic, morphological, and phonological convergence.

The Sumerian language is somewhat of a mystery to scholars. It is an isolate with no clear ancestors or descendants, but also with clear relationships with both Afro-Asiatic and Indo-European languages and potentially with other contemporary linguistic isolates such as Elamite. Thus I would identify Sumerian or its parent language as the the united tongue of the Noahites described in Genesis 11.1. This explains why it is a distinct isolate with such diverse affinities with many far-flung languages such as Uralic, Kartvellian, Basque, Sanskrit and Armenian as well as contemporary Akkadian.

Of course the events at Babel vastly predate the emergence of the Israelites but the Sumerian language is relevant to their history and that of the nations Israel would later be scattered among.

‘Sumer: the Civilization of Babel’

https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/sumer-the-civilization-of-babel/

There is considerable evidence that the early Semites, Arphaxadites and Hebrews had extensive contact with Indo-European speakers or were perhaps even Indo-European speakers originally. One of the sons of Shem was Arphaxad who sired Eber, the eponymous patriarch of the Hebrews, and the name Arphaxad is quite likely of Indo-European origin. Strongs Exhaustive Concordance offers no Hebrew etymology for Arpakshad (H775) and says that it is probably of foreign origin. In Gesenius Hebrew-Chaldee Lexicon in the entry for Arpakshad he remarks that it is not improbable that it corresponds to Arrapachitis/Arraphka (proposed by Bochart, Phaleg 2.4) in the Northern reaches of Assyria adjacent to Media. He also notes that von-Bohlen compares Arpakshad to the Sanskrit word Arjapakshata meaning “(a land) by the side of Asia” or more properly “by the side of Arya”.

While highly apocryphal, the Book of Jubilees states that Madai had married a daughter of Shem, and preferred to live among Shem’s descendants, rather than to dwell in Japheth’s allotted lands beyond the Black Sea. He begged his brothers-in-law, Elam, Asshur and Arphaxad, and finally received from them the land that was named after him, Media (10.50-51). Another line in Jubilees (8.5) states that a daughter of Madai named Milcah married Cainan, who is an ancestor of Abraham also mentioned in the Septuagint version of Genesis and in the Gospel of Luke (3.36). Whether or not Jubilees is canonical or accurate, it may be considered an ancient witness to a neighbour and kin relationship between Arphaxadites and the Indo-Iranic Medes, perhaps lending credence to the interpretation of Arphaxad as “by the side of Arya”.

The only other commonly proposed etymology for Arpakshad is from the Hebrew phrase arpa Kesed meaning “boundary of Kesed” but this is unlikely as Kesed descended from Arphaxad and they were certainly not contemporary nor did Kesed precede Arphaxad. Thus Arphaxad’s name could not be a reference to Kesed and the Indo-European etymology seems more likely. It also is fitting in light of the probable location of Arphaxad in Arrapachitis near to Media. In Joshua 24.2 and 15 the ancestors of the Israelites are described as being pagans who dwelt “beyond the river”. This river is the Euphrates of course and is identified as such by all notable scholars. “Beyond the Euphrates” is a phrase found both in the writings of Josephus (Antiquities, 11.133) and the Dead Sea Scrolls (The War Scroll). In The War Scroll the description “beyond the Euphrates” is applied to Togar (Togarmah) and Masha (Meshech) which are commonly identified as lands in modern Russia, Georgia and Armenia.

In the preface to Josephus’ Wars the phrase describes those “with the Adiabeni”. Adiabene consisted of the plains beyond the Tigris bordering Babylonia to the South, Armenia to the North and Media in the East. So we see that the phrase “beyond the Euphrates” in Israelite literature refers consistently to the Northernmost regions of Western Asia which sit well within the range of the spread of Indo-European languages. In ancient times these lands were under the influence of Anatolian, Armenian and Iranic Indo-European speakers.

Another of the sons of Shem was Lud, and his descendants are commonly identified as the Lydians and Luwians of Anatolia. Both of these tribal groups spoke languages of the Anatolian family of Indo-European languages and were quite close to the domain of the kindred Arphaxadites. The Lydians and Luwians shared Anatolia with the Hattians who had become Indo-Europeanized by conquest at an early time. It is possible that the Indo-European conquerors who subdued the Hattians and established the Hittite empire were a confederacy of Anatolian speaking Semitic tribes descended from Lud and Arphaxad along with neighbouring Japhetic tribes.

Like the Indo-Europeans in general, the Hebrews originated as nomadic pastoralists persisting mainly on flocks and herds of sheep and cattle, a lifestyle refered to very frequently in Scripture from the time of Abraham onward. The Hebrews also had dairy as a staple of their diet (Genesis 18.8, 49.12, Deuteronomy 32.13-14, Song of Solomon 5.1, Isaiah 7.22, et al.) indicating lactose tolerance, a trait many scholars associate with the expansion of Indo-European peoples. The Hebrews employed chariotry in war (Micah 5.10, Isaiah 2.7, 31.1, 2 Samuel 15.1, 1 Kings 4.26, 2 Kings 13.14, 2 Chronicles 1.14 et al.), technology which was first developed and spread by the Indo-Europeans. They were also well acquainted with horsemanship in general (Genesis 47.17, Psalm 32.9, 2 Kings 19.28, Isaiah 28.28, 30.28, 37.29 et al.), a vital part of the lifestyle of the early Indo-Europeans.

Hebrew is a patronym derived from Eber (H5676) which comes from abar (H5674) meaning “bring over”, “carry over” or “deliver”. Eber finds a likely Indo-European cognate, or perhaps even a root, in the proto-Indo-European root *bher- meaning “carry a burden”, “bring” or “give birth”. While it is beyond the scope of this discussion, it can be demonstrated that the Habiru of profane Near Eastern inscriptions are identifiable with the Biblical Hebrews who descended from Arphaxad. Excavations at Kultepe and Alishar in Anatolia, uncovered several collections of letters and legal and economic texts from Assyrian trading outposts of the old Akkadian period. Among them was a letter from one Assyrian merchant to another requesting that he seek the release of Habiru men who were imprisoned at the palace of Shalahshuwe, an unidentified neighbour, probably to the North of Alishar. In this letter we find that the Habiru are located in central Anatolia in the domain of the Hittites.

While many Habiru personal names are of Semitic origin, many are of Hurrian and Indo-European origin as observed by Robert B. Coote and Carol A. Redmount. The Hurrians were the dominant ethnic group in Southern Anatolia, Northern Mesopatamia and Northeastern Syria from the mid 3rd millenium to the mid 2nd millenium BC. There is evidence that Abraham may have been part of Hurrian culture and regarded as a part of the Hurrian elite.

There are cultural aspects of Abraham and his kindred possibly indicating a Hurrian cultural origin. In Hurrian culture property ownership was held by family clans and their household gods and its use was leased to individual family members. Control of the household gods and thus the family property was held by the senior male which explains the importance of the Biblical story of Rebekah’s theft of Laban’s idols.

A cultural custom unique to the Hurrians was the practice of adopting one’s wife as their sister which had to do with property and marriage laws. This helps to explain the odd occurences where Abraham claims that Sarah is his sister to the Pharaoh in Egypt and to the Philistine king of Gerar.

Jacob’s stealing of the birthright from Esau finds context in the Hurrian custom whereby the household gods would be passed down in a dying utterance to the eldest son, or sometimes the wife’s brother. It was Rebekah from Harran who instructed Jacob to deceive his father, Isaac by disguising himself as his older brother Esau.

In Genesis 23.6, we read that the Hittites tell Abraham “thou art in the midst of us a king from God; bury thy dead in our choice sepulchres”. Like the Hurrians, the Hittites were ruled by a related Indo-European elite. The only plausible reason that these Hittites would regard Abraham as royalty is if he belonged to this Indo-European elite which exerted its rule among the Hittites, Mitanni, Kassites and Hurrians. Considering Abraham’s substantial wealth and military power this is certainly plausible.

Abraham’s ancestor Terah was said to have come from Harran in Anatolia. At the time that Terah and Abraham dwelt there Harran was a city inhabited mainly by Hurrians and an important Hurrian centre as evidenced in the Nuzi tablets. It seems that Ur Kasdim, the city of Abraham’s nativity, was actually the Hurrian city of Urkesh. In Genesis 24 Abraham sends Eliezer to the land of his birth. Here we find the sort of ethnic elitism which would be typical of a nomadic Indo-European aristocraticy sojourning in the Levant. Isaac’s son Jacob was likewise expected to marry a woman of his own tribe and to avoid intermarriage with the Hurrian/Horite and Hattian/Hittite lower castes, a mistake made by his cursed brother Esau.

“1And Abraam was old, advanced in days, and the Lord blessed Abraam in all things. 2And Abraam said to his servant the elder of his house, who had rule over all his possessions, Put thy hand under my thigh, 3and I will adjure thee by the Lord the God of heaven, and the God of the earth, that thou take not a wife for my son Isaac from the daughters of the Chananites, with whom I dwell, in the midst of them. 4But thou shalt go instead to my country, where I was born, and to my tribe, and thou shalt take from thence a wife for my son Isaac.”

‘Fornication Adultery and Idolatry: a Biblical Case Against Miscegenation and Multiculturalism’

https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/03/06/fornication-adultery-and-idolatry-a-biblical-case-against-miscegenation/

Later on in verse 10 we find out where Eliezer went to reach the land of Abraham’s birth; Northern Mesopotamia (Aram Naharayim). After working for Laban, Jacob passed over the Euphrates back into Canaan (Genesis 31.21). If Ur Kasdim were the Ur in Southern Mesopotamia, then Jacob would not need to cross the Euphrates. Laban lived in Paddan Aram, which is in the region of Haran (Genesis 28.5-7), which seems to be the same area as Aram-Naharaim, Abraham’s homeland (Genesis 24.10).

All this evidence taken together seems to indicate that the Ur Kasdim of Abraham was in the same region as Haran in Northern Mesopotamia, and not was not the famous Ur in Southern Mesopotamia. This certainly seems far more plausible than the nomadic pastoral warlord Abraham hailing from the urban commercial hub that was the Southern Ur.

The Kasdim of Scripture are rightly identified with the Kassites of ancient Near Eastern history. Some scholars suggest that Kasdim in Genesis 11.28 is an anachronistic reference to Chaldaean Babylonia of the 8th century BC. However Ur was almost a ghost town by the 8th century and so a reference to “Ur of the Chaldaeans” makes no historical sense as an alleged 8th century anachronism.

More challenging for this view however is a linguistic problem: there is no lamed in Kasdim, which instead has a sibilant as its second phoneme, whereas the name Chaldaeans is never historically attested without a lamed, or with a sibilant. Attested in the the Nuzi tablets is a personal name; Ka-ši-du meaning “Kassite”. This bears far more resemblance to the Hebrew word Kasdim than any form of Chaldaean. Furthermore in Sumerian Ur is actually written as Urim and in Akkadian as Uru.

In truth there is no anachronism and the Chaldaeans were merely called Kasdim in later times as they inhabited former Kassite Babylonia. For the same reason we see Hittite in Scripture refers both to the original Hattians and their later Indo-European conquerors who established the Hittite Empire. For similar reasons Abraham is refered to as a Hebrew according to his lineage (Genesis 14.13) while his son Jacob is called an Aramaean according to his dwelling (Deuteronomy 26.5). Likewise their Hebrew relative Laban was called an Aramaean according to his habitation (Genesis 31.20, 24). Many other examples of such occurrences can be found in Scripture and it is quite common for individuals and even nations to be refered to by geographical handles which may elsewhere be used ethnographically.

Attempts to classify the Kassite language have led to the proposal that it belongs to the Hurro-Urartian family. The Kassite elite are commonly thought to have been descended from Indo-European peoples and several scholars such as Sir John Lynton Myres, Robert MacHenry and E.D. Phillips, have identified many of their personal names and deity names as Indo-European. It seems most probable that the Kassites were of the same ethnic composition as the Hurrians. Of course the Biblical Kasdim were descendants of Kesed, a nephew of Abraham.

The Mitanni were a group of Indo-Europeans who ruled over Hurrians. The Mitanni empire lasted from roughly 1,500 to 1,300 BC. The land of Mitanni in northern Syria extended from the Taurus mountains to its West and as far East as Nuzi and the river Tigris. In the South, it extended from Aleppo across to Mari on the Euphrates in the East. The Mitanni were friendly neighbours of the Kassites. In Egyptian records the Mitanni kingdom is refered to as Naharin from the Assyro-Akkadian word for “river”. It may well be that Mitanni corresponds to Biblical Aram Naharayim (Aram of the two rivers), Abraham’s homeland.

One of the place names most commonly identified with Arphaxad is the city of Arraphka in the North East of modern Iraq near ancient Media. Around 2,000 BC the Hurrians established the small kingdom of Arraphka centered in the city which recieved that same name.

In light of this evidence it seems most plausible that Abraham hailed from a race of Indo-European elites who sat at the cultural intersection of Indo-European, Hurro-Urartian and Semitic cultures and languages which occured throughout Syria, Anatolia, Canaan and Northern Mesopotamia surrounding the time of Abraham, his forebears and his kin.

‘Habiru: Reavers of the Fertile Crescent’

https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/habiru-reavers-of-the-fertile-crescent/

The next major contact with Indo-European languages occurs in Canaan where the Israelites encountered Hittites, Ionian Greeks and Philistines. The Israelites traded extensively with the Ionians and intermarried to some extent with the Philistines. At this time the Israelites generally speak North-West Semitic languages.

Both the Philistines (often identified by biblical scholars with the Minoan culture) and the Ionians spoke variants of early Greek. This Hellenization certainly had a profound effect on the northern house of Israel.

There are numerous Semitic loan words in early forms of Greek and the Greek alphabet itself is derived from the Phoenician script. Phoenician was an early form of the Israelite script and paleo-Hebrew is widely known to be a form of Phoenician.

Many linguists acknowledge an Eastern Mediterranean sprachbund which facilitated trade and diplomacy in the ancient Eastern Mediterranean. North-West Semitic languages were a crucial part of this sprachbund and doubtless the Israelites both contributed to its development and were influenced by the contributions of early Greek speakers.

‘Dardan, Danaan and Dorian Origins: the Mediterranean Migrations of Ancient Israel’

https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/02/13/dardan-danaan-and-dorian-origins-the-mediterranean-migrations-of-israel-2/

An astounding affinity exists between the Northwest Semitic languages and the Celtic languages. Many scholars have noted this over the years including J. Courtenay James, Karel Jongeling, E. Raymond Capt, R. Govett, Beale Poste, Dr. Davies, Dr. Duncan McDougall, Samuel Lysons, Morris Jones, Theo Vennemann, Julius Pokorny, Heinrich Wagner, and Orin Gensler, to name just a few.

Both Celtic and Semitic languages are generally verb-subject-object in their default syntax. The two groups of languages feature extensive use of prepositions inflected for person and number. In both languages prepositions can be used to express obligation or possession. Celtic and Semitic languages both make use of resumptive pronouns in relative clauses.

Both families have a definite article but no indefinite article. Both use the construct state genitive in which two nouns are placed one after the other with the first noun modifying the second. Semitic and Celtic tongues both use the equivalent of “and” to subordinate one clause to the previous clause.

In 1675 Charles Edwards (“Hanes y Fydd”) documented what he termed Welsh Cambro-Brittanic Hebraisms which show that whole phrases in Welsh can be closely paralleled by whole phrases in Hebrew. It should be noted that when account is taken for likely and known dialectical changes of pronounciation the examples given in effect show identical Welsh parallel phrases for the Hebrew original.

In Welsh: Gael hedd meaning “Geledd” i.e. “Heap of testimony” (Genesis 31.47) = in Hebrew: Galaed.

In Welsh: Bagad meaning “A troop cometh?” (Genesis 30.11) = in Hebrew: Ba gad.

In Welsh: Anudon meaning “Without God” = in Hebrew: Aen Adon.

In Welsh: Yni all sy dda meaning “I am the Almighty God” (Genesis 17.1) = in Hebrew: Ani El Saddai.

In Welsh: Llai iachu yngwyddd achau ni meaning “Let him not live before our brethren” (Genesis 31.32) = in Hebrew: Loa yichei neged acheinu.

In Welsh: Ochoren ballodddi hoc-dena meaning “After I am waxed old shall I have pleasure?” = in Hebrew: Acharei belothi hedenah (Genesis 18.12).

In Welsh: Bebroch fra am beneu ach ef, dyfet Deborah mam ianceth Ribecah meaning “When he fled from the face of his brother. But Deborah Rebecca’s nurse died” (Genesis 35.7-8) = in Hebrew: Beborcho mpnei achiv vetamath Deborah mayneceth Ribecah.

In Welsh: Yngan Job yscoli yscoli cynghaws i (Job 6.1-2) meaning “Job answered, O that my grief were thoroughly weighed” = in Hebrew: Veya(g)n Eyub… shocol yishocal ca(g)si.

In Welsh: Amelhau bytheu chwi a bythau holl ufyddau chwi meaning “And they shall fill your house and the houses of all your servants” (Genesis 10.6) = in Hebrew: Umalu bathechoh and bathei col avedochoh.

In Welsh: Iachadd ni meaning “Thou hast healed me” = in Hebrew: Hechiyatni.

In Welsh: Nesa awyr peneu chwi meaning “Lift thou up the light of thy countenance” = in Hebrew: Nasa aor panechoh (Psalms 4.6).

In Welsh: As chwimwth meaning “an angry man” = in Hebrew: Ish chamas (Psalms 140.12, Proverbs 16.29 meaning a wickedly violent man).

In Welsh: Be heulo, luerferfo (Job 6.4) meaning “When his candle shined… and by his light” = in Hebrew: Behilo, leoroe.

In Welsh: Bwgythieu in gwarchaeni (Job 6.4) meaning “The terrors of God set themselves in array against me” = in Hebrew: Biu(g)thi elohai ya-a(g)rchuni.

In Welsh: I far meaning “Shall be cursed” = Hebrew: Yu-ar, yuv-ar. (Numbers 22.6).

In Welsh: Am geryddo fo meaning “At his reproof” = in Hebrew: Im ge-arato.

The prevailing narrative expressed by the Jewish archaeological authorities before the eyes of the secular world is one that attempts to distort the truth. They would have us believe that the Israelites were but an outgrowth of the indigenous Canaanite populace. Thus they evade further uncomfortable inquiry into their own spurious origins and the fate of ancient Israel. By convincing the mainstream that the Israelites were but an outgrowth of the indigenous Canaanites the Jews validate Zionism in the eyes of the secular world as a return of indigenous peoples to Palestine.

The Jewish archaeological and linguistic authorities have greatly obfuscated the linguistic history of Canaan. What is commonly called “proto-Canaanite” is actually the language of the Israelites of the Exodus which I would call Terahitic after Terah the ancestor of Abraham and Haran the father of Lot. Its writing system is “proto-Sinaitic” whose parent system is Egyptian hieroglyphics.

Derivatives include “Biblical Hebrew”, “Edomite”, “Ammonite” and “Moabite”. This raises an interesting question? Why is it named “Canaanite” when none of these tribes are direct Canaanite descendants, but rather descend (paternally at least) from Shemites of the line of Terah?

The languages of the Canaanites of Scripture (not as misidentified by Jewish archaeologists) are “Amorite” (perhaps properly proto-Canaanite) and its child “Ugaritic” (perhaps Canaanite). Little is claimed by experts about “Amorite” beyond defining it as ancestral to “Ugaritic”. Neither language uses any of the “North-West Semitic” alphabets like “proto-Sinaitic”, “Canaanite”, “Phoenician” and “paleo-Hebrew” etc. Rather “Ugaritic” has its own cuneiform derived script.

From “proto-Canaanite” comes “Canaanite” and there are two further developments from “Canaanite” identifiable with the Israelites: “Phoenician” and “Biblical Hebrew”. The linguistic and alphabetical lineage from “proto-Canaanite” to “Canaanite” to “Phoenician” and “Biblical Hebrew” is properly the Israelite linguistic development. Of course if scholars understood this it would prompt a line of questioning which would ultimately discredit Jewry and Zionism.

The Phoenicians of Phoenicia’s maritime golden age were one and the same people as ancient Israel, and they were surely not kin of modern day Jews. Rather they established many important European tribes including Milesians, Carthaginians, Thebians and others.

‘The Israelite Origins of Europa: the Phoenicians in the West’

https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-israelite-origins-of-europa-the-phoenicians-in-the-west/

When the northern house of Israel went into the Assyrian captivity they were placed among the Medes and Persians as a buffer population on the fringes of the Assyrian empire. There they would have, by necessity, adopted the Iranic lingua franca of these Medo-Persian territories.

This aligns with the Irano-Semitic language hypothesis which proposes an intermediary Irano-Semitic, Indo-Semitic or Aryo-Semitic language group conjoining Afro-Asiatic and Indo-European language groups (Carleton T. Hodge 1998:318, Alan S. Kaye 1985:887, Adams and Mallory 2006:83, Cuny 1943:1). This represents the complete crossover of the house of Israel into the Indo-European cultural and linguistic world.

As these Scythians penetrated into Central Europe they encountered various Indo-European speaking Adamic tribes. While beyond the scope of this discussion it can be demonstrated that these Scythian tribes formed the foremost racial element of the Germanic tribes.

‘Scythian Origins: the Lost Tribes in Iran, the Steppe and Europe’

https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/scythian-origins-the-lost-tribes-in-iran-the-steppe-and-europe/

There are many proto-Germanic words with likely Hebrew cognates. This aligns with Theo Venneman’s work Germania Semitica where he demonstrates a Semitic superstratum in the Germanic languages. Here we will look at a small sampling of these cognates.

PG *bautaną (giving us English beat) meaning “to push” or “strike” from PIE *bʰewd-  meaning “to hit” or “strike”. Compare to Hebrew baat (H1163) meaning “kick” from a primitive root meaning “to trample down”.

PG *ders- (giving us English dare) meaning “to be bold” or “have courage” from PIE root *dhers- meaning “bold”. Compare to Hebrew addir (H117) meaning “gallant”, “excellent” or “powerful”.

PG *beranan (giving us English bear) meaning “to bear” or “carry” from PIE root *bher- meaning “carry a burden”, “bring” or “give birth”. Compare to Hebrew abar (H5674) meaning “bring over”, “carry over” or “deliver”.

PG *leukhtam (giving us English light) meaning “light” or “brightness” from PIE root *leuk- also meaning “light” or “brightness”. Compare Hebrew lahat (H3857) meaning “flaming” from a primitive root meaning “to blaze”.

PG *grap- (giving us English grab, grasp and grapple) meaning “to grab” or “seize” from PIE *ghrebh- “to seize” or “reach”. Compare to Hebrew garaph (H1640) meaning “to sweep away” from a primitive root meaning “to bear off violently”.

PG *brennanan (giving us English burn) meaning “to set on fire” of uncertain derivation. Compare to Hebrew ba’ar (H1197) meaning likewise “burn”, “heat” or “kindle” from a primitive root meaning “set on fire”.

PG *ertho (giving us English earth) meaning “earth” or “soil” from an extended form of PIE root *er- meaning “earth” or “ground”. Compare to Hebrew erets (H776) meaning “earth” or “land”.

PG *askon (giving us English ash) meaning “ash” from PIE root *as- meaning “to burn” or “glow”. Compare to Hebrew esh (H784) meaning “burning”, “hot” or “fiery” and Hebrew ashan (H6225) from a primitive root meaning “to smoke”.

PG *buron (giving us English bore) meaning “to bore through” or “perforate” from PIE root *bhorh- meaning “hole”. Compare to Hebrew bowr (H953) meaning “pit”, “cistern” or “well”.

PG *dumbaz (giving us English dumb) meaning “dumb” or “dull” of uncertain derivation. Compare to Hebrew damah (H1820) meaning “to be brought to silence” from a primitive root meaning “to be dumb” or “silent”.

PG *bannan (giving us English ban) “to speak publicly”, “command” or “forbid” from a suffixed form of PIE root *bha- meaning “to speak”, “tell” or “say”. Compare to Hebrew bin (H995) meaning “direct” or “discern” from a primitive root meaning “inform” or “instruct”.

PG *gel- (giving us English yell) meaning “to yell” or “to resound” from PIE root *ghel- meaning “to call”. Compare to Hebrew yalal (H3213) meaning “be howling” from a primitive root meaning “to howl”.

PG *brekanan (giving us English break) meaning “to break apart” from PIE root *bhreg- meaning “to break”. Compare to Hebrew perek (H6531) meaning “fracture” from an unused root meaning “to break apart”.

PG *kall- (giving us English call) meaning “to cry out” from PIE root *gal- meaning “to call” or “shout”. Compare to Hebrew qol (H6963) meaning “cry out” or “noise” from an unused root meaning “to call aloud”.

There arises a great deal of confusion concerning the connections between the Afro-Asiatic and Indo-European languages. There is a wide range of dates proposed for the Irano-Semitic language and other scholars like Theo Vennemann point to Semitic stratum in Indo-European languages outside of the Iranic family such as Germanic and Celtic.

Whittaker proposed the Euphratic Indo-European language of Mesopotamia which he identifies as a substratum in Sumerian. Sumerian itself was once commonly thought to be an Indo-European language and Sumerian was also in a sprachbund with Akkadian, the eldest attested Semitic language. There is even the Nostratic hypothesis which proposes a broader Nostratic language group encompassing Sumerian, Indo-European and Afro-Asiatic among other languages generally belonging to Caucasoid peoples. All of this confusion concerning when Afro-Asiatic and Indo-European languages diverged and/or converged disappears in light of the Scriptural narrative.

There is a related question I often face and so I will take this opportunity to address it. If the Israelites are among modern Europeans how come most distinctive European DNA is commonly thought to come from Anatolia or the Pontic-Caspian Steppe according to the favoured Kurgan and Anatolian hypotheses of Indo-European origins?

According to Scripture the Israelite’s lineage was not native to Canaan or Mesopotamia but rather, like all the Adamic nations of Scripture, they originated between Anatolia and the Pontic Caspian Steppe at Mount Ararat in the region of ancient Urartu just South East of the Black Sea. From there the Adamites spread Eastward across the Steppe and Iran (Genesis 11.2). After their time travelling through Mesopotamia and Egypt and dwelling in Canaan they were deported by the Assyrians to Northern Mesopotamia. From there they exited the Near East through Anatolia, the Caucasus and Iran.

‘Scythian Origins: the Lost Tribes in Iran, the Steppe and Europe’

https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/02/13/scythian-origins-the-lost-tribes-in-iran-the-steppe-and-europe-2/

The two most likely contenders for a Proto-Indo-European Urheimat (Anatolia and the Pontic-Caspian Steppe) sit just either side of the Scriptural origin point of all the Adamites. They also encompass the heartland of the Israelites in classical antiquity from which they settled Europe. Thus we should fully expect (according to Scripture) the Israelites to have a genetic origin traceable to Anatolia and the Pontic-Caspian Steppe and not Palestine or other regions of the Middle East.

Sumer: the Civilization of Babel

Statue, Ebih II, Ur.

Biblical scholars have long generally agreed that the Shinar or Senaar of Genesis 11 where the Noahites all gathered after the flood is the Sumer of ancient Mesopotamia.

This is supported by the similarity in the two Semitic names (Sumer is an Akkadian word), the matching geographical descriptions and the association with Babel, Akkad and Uruk.

In Genesis 10.10 the empire of Nimrod is described as encompassing Babel, Akkad and Uruk in the land of Shinar. This seems to describe the Akkadian Empire which came to rule over Mesopotamia, the Levant and Anatolia.

In Genesis 11 the Noahites all gathered in Sumer/Shinar and there they shared in the same speech and custom:

“1And all the earth was one lip, and there was one language to all. 2And it came to pass as they moved from the east, they found a plain in the land of Senaar, and they dwelt there.”
-Genesis 11

Sumerian votive statue, Eshnunna.

The Sumerian language is known today as a linguistic isolate, but was once thought to be the origin of the Indo-European languages. A comparison between Sumerian and Indo-European was made by Charles Autran already in 1925, finding many similar roots and even suffixes, like -ta for the origin (Sanskrit -tas), -bi for the instrumental (Sanskrit -bhis).

Gordon Whittaker, since 1998, has identified so-called Euphratic, a substratum or superstratum in Sumerian, with an Indo-European language. Particularly interesting is his analysis of the phonetic values, without meaning in Sumerian, of pictographic symbols, which in some cases can suggest an IE connection.

The symbol for a fish is read peš, which recalls PIE *pisk/peisk- ‘fish’, perhaps from the Indo-European root pi- ‘to drink’ and the frequentative suffix -sk-. The symbol of a bird is read hu, and can be compared with PIE *hwi/hwai- ‘bird’ (notably Armenian hav meaning ‘chicken’).

The logogram for ‘dog’, with an animal head, is read lik, and recalls PIE *wlkwa- ‘wolf’, especially Greek lykos. The logogram for ‘fox’, with the symbol of a fox’s head with large ears, is read lib/lub, comparable to the PIE *wlpe- ‘fox’ (Latin vulpes, Greek alopex), which is apparently an offshoot or variant of the previous one (with kw > p).

The phonetic values for ‘prince’ are nar/nara, as in the Sanskrit term for ‘man, hero’ (ner/nir). In a publication of 2012, Whittaker has suggested laws of phonetic change from Euphratic to Sumerian, which is a necessary aspect in a scientific demonstration of the existence of this Indo-European language.

In support he cites other examples of phonetic values, like sah/suh for the sign ‘thread+thread’, recalling Sanskrit sū-tra-‘thread’, from the root s(y)ū- ‘to sew’, corresponding to Latin su-ere. Also of note is semed for the sign ‘one’, comparable to the PIE root *sam-, found e.g. in English same and Latin semel ‘once’.

Also Aleksi Sahala, Assyriologist of the University of Helsinki, has between 2009 and 2013 proposed 30 Sumerian words with a possible common etymology with Indo-European.

In 1927, the British explorer and scholar of Sanskrit, Laurence Waddell published a book with the title Aryan Origin of the Alphabet and Sumer-Aryan Dictionary.

Sumerian civilization was generally bilingual with the general populace being fluent in both Sumerian and Akkadian, the earliest attested Semitic language. Of course both languages used the same Sumero-Akkadian cuneiform.

Sumerian cuneiform account, Shuruppak.

Linguists regard the relationship between Sumerian and Akkadian as a “sprachbund”; a group of closely related languages with profound influence on one another from lexical borrowing on a large scale, to syntactic, morphological, and phonological convergence.

The Sumerian language is somewhat of a mystery to scholars. It is an isolate with no clear ancestors or descendants, but also with clear relationships with both Afro-Asiatic and Indo-European languages and potentially with other contemporary linguistic isolates such as Elamite.

Thus I would identify Sumerian or its parent language as the the united tongue of the Noahites described in Genesis 11.1. This explains why it is a distinct isolate with such diverse affinities with many far-flung languages such as Uralic, Kartvellian, Basque, Sanskrit and Armenian as well as contemporary Akkadian.

‘The Linguistic Developments of the Shemites, Hebrews and Israelites’ 
https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-linguistic-developments-of-the-shemites-hebrews-and-israelites/

In Shinar/Sumer the Noahites built ziggurats reaching to the sky. Ziggurats had spiritual significance to the ancient Mesopotamians who would erect altars at their peaks where they were closest to the heavens.

“3And a man said to his neighbour, Come, let us make bricks and bake them with fire. And the brick was to them for stone, and their mortar was bitumen. 4And they said, Come, let us build to ourselves a city and tower, whose top shall be to heaven, and let us make to ourselves a name, before we are scattered abroad upon the face of all the earth.”
-Genesis 11

The Sumerians introduced urban civilization and expanded their territory across Mesopotamia as far as Iran and Anatolia. Mesopotamian culture has, from ancient Sumer down to Babylon, been a very morally and sexually permissive culture. Lewd behavior was the norm with people frequently and freely enganging in public sex acts and all manner of sexual perversion. The pagan cults of Mesopotamia were among the most profane in all history. Temple prostitution, ritual miscegenation and human sacrifice were well known to the pagans of ancient Mesopotamia.

https://christogenea.org/essays/broken-cisterns

Ancient Sumer had degenerated into an immoral society in a short time quickly becoming an imperialistic, decadent, materialistic, perverse and idolatrous society. They reached towards the heavens and God above saw their pridefulness and sinfulness:

“5And the Lord came down to see the city and the tower, which the sons of men built. 6And the Lord said, Behold, there is one people, and one lip of all, and they have begun to do this, and now nothing shall fail from them of all that they may have undertaken to do. 7Come, and having gone down let us there confound their tongue, that they may not understand each the voice of his neighbour. 8And the Lord scattered them thence over the face of all the earth, and they left off building the city and the tower. 9On this account its name was called Confusion, because there the Lord confounded the languages of all the earth, and thence the Lord scattered them upon the face of all the earth.”
-Genesis 11

Statue, Eannatum, Lagash.

Interestingly the narrative of Genesis 11 is comparable to parts of the Sumerian epic Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta. In this tale Enmerkar of Uruk is building a massive ziggurat in Eridu and demands a tribute of precious materials from Aratta for its construction. At one point he recites an incantation imploring the god Enki to restore (or in Kramer’s translation, to disrupt) the linguistic unity of the inhabited regions which are named as Shubur, Hamazi, Sumer, Uri-ki (Akkad), and the Martu land. While quite different from the Genesis 11 account, both accounts contain the association of the construction of a large ziggurat with divine powers disrupting linguistic unity.

From this time hence forth the Noahites began to disperse from Mesopotamia through the whole of the Fertile Crescent, the Mediterranean Basin, and other points in Eurasia and North Africa.

These nations include the ancient tribes of Europe such as Tartesians, Rhodians, Ionians, Thracians and Lydians and Etruscans as well as White tribes of the Near East like the Medes, Aramaeans, Persians and Pharaonic Egyptians among others.

These are the ancestors of all Caucasians alive today and the broadest possible group of recipients of any promise or blessing from God.

Sumerian votive statues, Eshnunna.

‘Adam: The Patriarch of One Race’ 
https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/adam-the-patriarch-of-one-race/

‘The Tree of Life: Redemption of the Adamic Race’
https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/02/13/the-tree-of-life-redemption-of-the-adamic-race/

https://christogenea.org/essays/race-genesis-10